2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Structure and Language Structure: the New Nomothetic Approach

Abstract: Recent studies have taken advantage of newly available, large-scale, cross-linguistic data and new statistical techniques to look at the relationship between language structure and social structure. These 'nomothetic' approaches contrast with more traditional approaches and a tension is observed between proponents of each method. We review some nomothetic studies and point out some challenges that must be overcome. However, we argue that nomothetic approaches can contribute to our understanding of the links be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the relationship between population size and morphological complexity (see above). This type of study can be valuable for testing hypotheses, generating hypotheses and acting as a catalyst for interdisciplinary work [14].…”
Section: Evaluating Nomothetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the relationship between population size and morphological complexity (see above). This type of study can be valuable for testing hypotheses, generating hypotheses and acting as a catalyst for interdisciplinary work [14].…”
Section: Evaluating Nomothetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we suggest that nomothetic studies should be seen as hypothesis-generating tools that can work with and direct other methods such as idiographic studies, computational modelling, experiments and theoretical work [13], [14]. We also suggest some methods that might improve statistical inference and insight in nomothetic studies, including phylogenetic techniques and inferred causal graphs [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In some cases, reports of such relationships have been treated as interesting challenges for linguistics, and as potential catalysts for research questions (e.g. , Roberts & Winters 2012. In general, however, attempts to link language structure with extralinguistic factors are almost intrinsically suspect: The Boasian tradition (e.g., Boas 1931) insists that there are no "primitive" languages and emphasizes the suitability of all languages to their speakers' communicative needs; Whorfian ideas about the cognitive biases imposed by the native language are no longer widely credited (but see Carroll et al 2004, Levinson 2012; Chomskyans assume the existence of universal (and probably innate) structural principles; and the Saussurean foundation of all modern linguistics means that linguists take for granted the arbitrariness of linguistic form almost from the first day of their first introduction to the subject.…”
Section: Correlational Studies Involving Extralinguistic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have explored how linguistic complexity is influenced by demographic variables, but the results remain contentious (Hay & Bauer, 2007;Lupyan & Dale, 2010;Moran, McCloy, & Wright, 2012;Roberts & Winters, 2012). To our knowledge, no studies have explored, from a cultural evolutionary perspective, how population size might influence cultural complexity in other non-technological domains, where the same intuitions about social learning might be expected to apply.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%