Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’ 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315112565-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social struggles in Uganda’s Acholiland: understanding responses and resistance to Amuru sugar works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent contributions to the Journal of Peasant Studies have explored the role of women vis-à-vis men in public protests against land grabbing and forced evictions, particularly in the case of palm oil expansion in Indonesia (Morgan, 2017), rubber concessions in Cambodia (Lamb et al, 2017), and sugarcane production in Uganda (Martiniello, 2015). Although these overt forms of political contention have had limited success in curbing displacement and dispossession, these studies are nonetheless important for understanding how gender, as a power-laden process, becomes directly embedded in struggles over land.…”
Section: Political Reactions From Below and Abovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent contributions to the Journal of Peasant Studies have explored the role of women vis-à-vis men in public protests against land grabbing and forced evictions, particularly in the case of palm oil expansion in Indonesia (Morgan, 2017), rubber concessions in Cambodia (Lamb et al, 2017), and sugarcane production in Uganda (Martiniello, 2015). Although these overt forms of political contention have had limited success in curbing displacement and dispossession, these studies are nonetheless important for understanding how gender, as a power-laden process, becomes directly embedded in struggles over land.…”
Section: Political Reactions From Below and Abovementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mine was interpreted within a historical regional context, and was seen as reinforcing relations of exploitation. This resonates with other cases in which land deals and their attendant social tensions have been mapped onto longer histories of governmental neglect and violent conflict (Kandel 2015;Martiniello 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The relation between social movements and CBNRM is not unidirectional. Existing CBNRM, rights and management institutions can be repurposed or used as stepping stones to organize, legitimize, and sustain environmental justice mobilizations oriented to defending community livelihoods (85,(173)(174)(175)(176)(177). This has been observed mostly in the rural context and at local levels.…”
Section: Community-based Natural Resource Management Institutions Can Be Repurposed For Livelihood-based Mobilizations (Mostly In the Glomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, long-standing community associations in Colombia and their rights to self-organize water provision, as well as associated understandings of water as a living being and a commons, were key in the national campaign to constitutionally recognize the human right to water and to counter privatization proposals (102); additionally, in the US state of Washington, sovereign fishing rights of the Lummi Nation constituted the focal point of a movement against the construction of the largest coal-shipping port in the state (178). In Mongolia (173) and Uganda (175), the strong collective organization of herders, together with their resource allocation rules and the recognition of traditional leaders' authority on land matters, facilitated community mobilizations against extractive projects threatening their lands. Similarly, in the Ecuadorian Amazon, a community-based monitoring program has been key in the efforts of the Amazonian Defense Front movement to give visibility to the damage emanating from the local oil industry (179).…”
Section: Community-based Natural Resource Management Institutions Can Be Repurposed For Livelihood-based Mobilizations (Mostly In the Glomentioning
confidence: 99%