1993
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social support, adversities and emotional distress in an Italian community sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in other Italian studies, it seems that community ties would be less important than strong family relationships in preventing emotional distress [34]. The lower risk of MI found in farmers and in people with a large family may give indirect indications of a protective effect of high family support and other related psychosocial and behavioural factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As noted in other Italian studies, it seems that community ties would be less important than strong family relationships in preventing emotional distress [34]. The lower risk of MI found in farmers and in people with a large family may give indirect indications of a protective effect of high family support and other related psychosocial and behavioural factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A Total Social Support score ranges from 12 to 84, with higher scores corresponding to high support and better adjustment to stress (Bolger & Eckenrode 1991, Grassi et al 2000. The MSPSS was used in order to gain a measure of a possible mediator between stress and psychophysiological response to stress, as suggested by previous studies (Zimmermann-Tansella et al 1993, Shields 2004).…”
Section: Psychological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By these means we attempted to help augment the relative scarcity of epidemiological data concerning the Italian general population [35]. In fact, a series of studies has employed self-report measures in community samples as an index of minor psychiatric morbidity [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42], while interview-based general population surveys have limited the investigation to single diagnostic categories such as mood [13, 43, 44, 45, 46], anxiety [14]and somatoform [15, 47]disorders. Other studies have considered only selected age groups [48, 49, 50, 51]or have evaluated point prevalence of both anxiety and depressive disorders in small samples [52, 53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%