2014
DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.38.6.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Support and Peer Norms Scales for Physical Activity in Adolescents

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate psychometric properties of a Social Support and Peer Norms Scale in 5th-7th grade urban girls. Methods Baseline data from 509 girls and test-retest data from another 94 girls in the Midwestern US were used. Results Cronbach's alpha was .83 for the Social Support Scale and .72 for the Peer Norms Scale, whereas test-re-test reliability was .78 for both scales. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a single factor structure for the Social Support Scale, and a 3-factor structure for the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, social support did not reference a specific person but instead referred to total support received from others in general. Correlations with objectively measured MVPA ( r = 0.13) for the 8‐item version of the instrument have been reported (Ling et al, ) and are slightly lower than those of other measures specifically assessing parent ( r = 0.22) and peer ( r = 0.28) support (Reimers, Jekauc, Mess, Mewes, & Woll, ). Lack of significant relationships in the HPM in this study may be related to how social support was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, social support did not reference a specific person but instead referred to total support received from others in general. Correlations with objectively measured MVPA ( r = 0.13) for the 8‐item version of the instrument have been reported (Ling et al, ) and are slightly lower than those of other measures specifically assessing parent ( r = 0.22) and peer ( r = 0.28) support (Reimers, Jekauc, Mess, Mewes, & Woll, ). Lack of significant relationships in the HPM in this study may be related to how social support was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…PA social support was measured using an 8‐item Social Support Scale shown to have adequate reliability and validity among adolescent girls (Ling, Robbins, Resnicow, & Bakhoya, ). In this study, the CFA model for this 8‐item scale indicated a significant model chi‐square value and marginal fit to the data based on alternative fit indices (χ 2 = 100.3869; df = 20; p < .001; RMSEA = 0.088; CFI = 0.975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An 8‐item Social Support Scale was used to measure forms of instrumental assistance and emotional encouragement for PA that girls received from others. The scale has good reliability and validity (Ling et al, ). Cronbach's alpha and test‐retest reliability were .83 and .78, respectively; results from exploratory factor analysis suggested a single‐factor structure; and social support was significantly correlated with accelerometer‐measured PA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although adolescent girls may receive social support for PA from a variety of sources, research has mainly focused on social support received by adolescents from parents (Laird et al, 2016), peers or friends (Garcia et al, 2016), and family members (Edwardson, Gorely, Musson, Duncombe, & Sandford, 2014). These studies do not capture social support received from nonfamily members, such as teachers and coaches or instructors (e.g., dance; Laird et al, 2016;Ling, Robbins, Resnicow, & Bakhoya, 2014). Little is known about whether the number of sources of support is related to adolescent girls' PA (Laird et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment procedures and response rates have been reported (Ling, Robbins, Resnicow, & Bakhoya, 2014; Robbins et al, 2013). During data collection, girls completed an iPad-delivered survey that included the perceived barriers to PA and recreational screen time measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%