2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social support, mastery, sleep-related problems and their association with functional status in untreated obstructive sleep apnoea patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other secondary outcomes were scores on the ESS, self-reported patient evaluation of daytime somnolence (range, 0-24; higher scores indicate greater severity), 18 and the quality and pattern of sleep, which were evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Questionnaire Index (range, 0-21; higher scores indicate greater severity). 19 The severity of snoring was evaluated through the Snore Outcomes Survey (range, 0-100; lower scores indicate greater severity). 20 Lam et al reported that the mean difference in AHI for group C was 1.2, and Vicini et al stated that the mean difference in AHI for group S was 225.67.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other secondary outcomes were scores on the ESS, self-reported patient evaluation of daytime somnolence (range, 0-24; higher scores indicate greater severity), 18 and the quality and pattern of sleep, which were evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Questionnaire Index (range, 0-21; higher scores indicate greater severity). 19 The severity of snoring was evaluated through the Snore Outcomes Survey (range, 0-100; lower scores indicate greater severity). 20 Lam et al reported that the mean difference in AHI for group C was 1.2, and Vicini et al stated that the mean difference in AHI for group S was 225.67.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcomes included total sleep time, percentages of total sleep time spent in N1‐N3 and REM, sleep efficiency, and the lowest oxygen saturation during sleep. Other secondary outcomes were scores on the ESS, self‐reported patient evaluation of daytime somnolence (range, 0‐24; higher scores indicate greater severity), 18 and the quality and pattern of sleep, which were evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Questionnaire Index (range, 0‐21; higher scores indicate greater severity) 19 . The severity of snoring was evaluated through the Snore Outcomes Survey (range, 0‐100; lower scores indicate greater severity) 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%