Social sustainability for whom? Developing an analytical approach through a tripartite collaboration

Abstract

Purpose Social sustainability is a concept frequently referred to in public debates concerning how to construct the governance of future societies. The interpretations of its meaning, however, are ambiguous, and practices often dubious. Confronting top-down technocratic governance structures, this paper aims to argue for for tripartite collaborations between residents, higher education institutions (HEIs) and local government, as an approach toward social sustainability that involves residents’ interests in local governance. Design/methodology/approach This study argues that a specific time-spatial method of analysis can benefit the co-creation of knowledge as it passes through the spectrum of resident–HEI–local government. It provides a way for resident perceptions to become structured knowledge that originates from the residents, effectively engendering a bottom-up governance structure. Findings This study shows how to include residents in policymaking and implementation processes as co-creators of knowledge, and thereby displays the possibility of examining knowledge and competence within municipal projects for social sustainability. Originality/value The model developed in this study can be used as a methodological instrument to analyze and expand resident participation in local social sustainability work. It thereby provides a toolbox for inclusive policymaking and strategies.

The Tripartite Structure of Sustainability: a new educational approach to bridge the gap to wise and sustainable action

“…The adoption of this model could herald a novel paradigm in both research and education concerning sustainability. Moreover, this structural framework could serve as a valuable analytical tool, akin to Sunnemark et al (2023). The latter, also structured as a 3×3 grid, distinguishes between the "holistic perspective" dimension (stages, actors, manuscript), and the "individual perspective" dimension (individual, social, and authoritative levels).…”