Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises

Guo, Rui; Wu, Zhenyong

doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02565-3

Cited by 17 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 81 publications

(81 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other co-cited references are related to theories such as organizational behavior considered in the studies of Gholamrezai et al (2021), Hameed et al (2021), andHopwood et al (2022) or empirical models including fuzzy, structural equations, bounds testing approaches, and linear models that have been applied in many studies to assess environmental sustainability. In particularl, the fuzzy model was considered in the studies of Garg et al (2022), Goyal et al (2021), Guo &Wu (2022), andPerçin (2022).The structural equations were considered in the studies of Sachin & Rajesh (2022) and Sekhar & Raina (2021).The bounds testing approaches were considered in the studies of Udemba (2022) and Danlami et al (2018), and the linear models were applied in the studies of Sameen & Feroze (2021) and Bissinger & Bogner (2018).…”

Section: Most Co-cited Reference Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Ellili

2023

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to highlight the current trends in the literature on sustainability by applying a bibliometric review of papers on sustainability published in Environment, Development and Sustainability . Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative approach to bibliographic materials that highlights the core theoretical and empirical research on a specific field. In addition, it allows the classification of previous studies. Previous bibliometric reviewers were limited to sustainability papers in specific industries, while this study considers all papers on sustainability to provide further insights on overall sustainability topics. The analysis was based on keyword cartography analysis, bibliometric authors’ citation analysis, bibliometric papers’ citation analysis, bibliometric references’ co-citation analysis, journals’ co-citation cartography, and qualitative content analysis. A total of 997 articles on sustainability were reviewed. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer and content analysis was performed using WordStat. Six major clusters were identified: environmental sustainability, sustainable development, urban sustainability, ecological footprint, environment, and climate change. In addition, the results reveal that Environment, Development and Sustainability has increasingly experienced important growth in research papers and citations, reflecting its significant contribution to the sustainability research field. In addition, this study presents recommendations for future research opportunities in the field of sustainability. The findings of this study have implications for sustainability research, such as the assessment of environmental and social sustainability in multinational institutional contexts and across industries as well as the examination of the impact of environmental and social sustainability on different corporate aspects and decisions. This study is the only one to review the key topics on which papers published in Environment, Development and Sustainability are focused and can be largely used for sustainability practices. This study provides an overview of how the literature on sustainability has developed, as well as a summary of the most productive authors, along with countries, organizations, and journal sources. This offers an opportunity for future research to focus on this topic.

show abstract

Section: Most Co-cited Reference Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Ellili

2023

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indicators categories Paper (Author, year) Environmental (Acquaye et al 2017, Bai and Sarkis 2014, Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014, Chen and Kitsis 2017, Chiarini 2017, Choudhary et al 2021, De Sousa Jabbour et al 2015, Feitó-Cespón et al 2017, Guo and Wu 2022, Hassini et al 2012, Ivascu 2020, Khan et al 2017, Kuwornu et al 2023, Lee and Wu 2014, Morella et al 2020, Narimissa et al 2020, Ngan et al 2018, Pinto 2017, Piotrowicz and Cuthbertson 2015, Rajesh 2022, Resat and Unsal 2019, Sadeghi et al 2022, Saeed and Kersten 2017, Tsolakis et al 2018, Varsei et al 2014 There are several indicators that address the sustainable perspective of the SC. Furthermore, there are some widely accepted and well adapted international reference models (Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014, Piotrowicz Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Lisbon, Portugal, July 18-20, 2023 © IEOM Society International and Cuthbertson 2015).…”

Section: Table 2 Articles Classification By the Triple Bottom Line + ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is a result of the above-mentioned lack of standardization and the tendency to create new indicatorsor adapt and rename them with new names. OECD (Acquaye et al 2017, Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014, Goharshenasan et al 2022, Hassini et al 2012, Karaman et al 2020, Morali and Searcy 2013, Saeed and Kersten 2017 SDGs (Chiarini 2017, Ivascu 2020, Kuwornu et al 2023, Saeed and Kersten 2017, Varsei et al 2014 Less than two-thirds of the studied articles refer to one or more of these reference models at least once. Furthermore, when defining the indicators, authors often source different definitions for the indicators.…”

Section: Table 2 Articles Classification By the Triple Bottom Line + ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sarkis 2014, Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014, Chen and Kitsis 2017,Choudhary et al 2021, Guo and Wu 2022, Hassini et al 2012, Khan et al 2017, Kuwornu et al 2023, Lee and Wu 2014, Narimissa et al 2020, Ngan et al 2018, Pinto 2017, Piotrowicz and Cuthbertson 2015, Rajesh 2022, Resat and Unsal 2019, Sadeghi et al 2022, Saeed and Kersten 2017, Varsei et al 2014 Economic(Bai and Sarkis 2014, Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014, Chen and Kitsis 2017, Chiarini 2017, Choudhary et al 2021, De Sousa Jabbour et al 2015, Feitó-Cespón et al 2017, Guo and Wu 2022, Hassini et al 2012, Ivascu 2020, Khan et al 2017, Kuwornu et al 2023, Lee and Wu 2014, Narimissa et al 2020, Ngan et al 2018, Pinto 2017, Piotrowicz and Cuthbertson 2015, Sadeghi et al 2022, Saeed and Kersten 2017, Sivarethinamohan et al 2021, Tsolakis et al 2018, Varsei et al 2014, Wang et al 2022 Innovation(Bai and Sarkis 2014, Chardine-Baumann and Botta-Genoulaz 2014…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards Data-Driven, Sustainable Supply Chain Quality Management 5.0 Indicators

Lazzaris,

M. Carvalho,

Sameiro Carvalho

2023

Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a growing interest in the concept of Industry 5.0 (I5.0), which supports a transition towards a more sustainable, resilient and human-oriented industrial paradigm. This paper focuses on the I5.0 sustainability pillar, which is crucial to optimize and support I5.0's data-driven and circular supply chains. In order to pursue a Sustainable Supply Chain (SSC) and improve data quality management across it, it is first imperative to understand to what extent the existing SSC quality indicators are aligned with the opportunities of the digitalization era, and if they support the path to I5.0 sustainable practices. This paper aims to do a comprehensive study and analysis of relevant groups of SSC metrics and indicators. Through a broad literature review, SSC metrics and indicators are identified. Then, they are assessed to determine if they are suitable and relevant to assist decision makers in the challenges towards SSC 5.0. Results reveal that despite growing interest in the progress of data-driven SSC in recent years, there are still research gaps, mainly concerning the standardization of indicators, the simplification of models, and the use of consistent models for the treatment and conversion of proper data into relevant information.

show abstract

“…(Abualfaraa et al, 2020;Bhattacharya et al, 2019;Caldera et al, 2017;Cherrafi, Elfezazi, Govindan, et al, 2017;Cherrafi et al, 2016;Chugani et al, 2017;Ciccullo et al, 2018;Dhingra et al, 2014;Dieste et al, 2019;Dües et al, 2013;Francis and Thomas, 2020;Garza-Reyes, 2015a, 2015bHallam and Contreras, 2016;Henao et al, 2019;Johansson and Sundin, 2014;Jose Martinez-Jurado and Moyano-Fuentes, 2014;Kumar et al, 2016;Leon and Calvo-Amodio, 2017;Mollenkopf et al, 2010;Sangwa and Sangwan, 2018;Sharma et al, 2021;Siegel et al, 2019;Souza Farias et al, 2019;Varela et al, 2019) KPI 51(Becchetti et al, 2022;Cipolletta et al, 2022;Contini and Peruzzini, 2022;Cooper et al, 2020;de Bortoli et al, 2022;Egas et al, 2021;Gackowiec et al, 2020;Goncalves and Silva, 2021;Govindan et al, 2021;Gunduz and Abu-Hijleh, 2020;Gunduz and Lutfi, 2021;Guo and Wu, n.d.;Hristov et al, 2022;Janjua et al, 2020Janjua et al, , 2021Karahasanovic et al, ...…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model

Sá,

Carvalho,

Fonseca

et al. 2023

Production Engineering Archives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development is a subject of intense discussion, mainly due to climate change, pollution, and increased waste, among other factors. The governments of various countries worldwide have been setting environmental targets for emissions and consumption to combat climate change and improve the state of our planet. Therefore, it is necessary to have an environmental policy with stakeholder engagement. The literature review method, bibliometric analysis, and visual mappings were applied to understand how these sustainable targets are formulated and used by companies to comply with the limits proposed by governments. The Web of Science platform allowed data collection about Lean and Green, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), and Science-Based Targets (SBT). The carried analyses identified the most relevant papers using the PRISMA method, including their authors, their temporal distribution, and a correlation map using the VOSviewer tool. Hence, mapping the current state of the art concerning the SBT topic. Furthermore, a novel conceptual model is proposed to integrate lean and green and create new KPI applied to the definition of SBT to give companies a path and tools to achieve the climate targets efficiently. Future research should focus on the implementation of the conceptual model in several companies to understand its impact to correct and improve the conceptual model proposed.

show abstract

Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises

Cited by 17 publications

References 81 publications

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability

Towards Data-Driven, Sustainable Supply Chain Quality Management 5.0 Indicators

Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About