Social Valuation Across Multiple Audiences: The Interplay of Ability and Identity Judgments

Abstract

How is an evaluating audience influenced by previous evaluations made by another audience? This question is critical to individuals and organizations reaching out to multiple audiences for key resources. While extant work has suggested evaluators are influenced by previous evaluations made by their peers, we develop theory about how evaluators' assessment of a candidate is shaped by previous evaluations made by an external (non-peer) audience. We argue that the latter represent exogenous indices that affect evaluators in two opposing ways: they positively influence peer valuation by pointing to candidates' unobservable abilities; yet, since they are conferred by an external audience, they are also indicative of candidates' deviation from an expected peer identity. The combination of the two opposite effects suggests an inverted U-shaped relationship between exogenous indices and peer valuation. Further, this effect is moderated by the identity proximity between audiences, and the availability of previous peer evaluations (endogenous indices). We test and find support for our arguments using unique data on the peer valuation of 9,502 academic scientists applying for research grants at a research university. Our work contributes to the understanding of valuation and socially endogenous inferences, and has implications for the management of organizations in multi-audience environments.

Moving Ideas from Lab to Marketplace: A Guide to Research

“…The tensions between academic and commercial demands are found to be more problematic at an individual than at an organizational level [4]. At the individual level, tensions between academic and business environments influence the collaborative behaviors of scientists [4], the strategic decisions of science-commercialization [5,6], as well as the perceptions of other audiences to which scientists turn for resource acquisition and individual legitimation [7]. These tensions can only to some degree be overcome by putting together teams working across the boundary of science and business.…”

Theories from the Lab: How Research on Science Commercialization can Contribute to Management Studies

“…At the individual level, contributions have emphasized how tensions between academic and business environments influence the collaborative behaviours of scientists (Ambos et al, 2008;Tortoriello et al, 2015), the strategic decisions of science commercialization (Bikard, 2018;Chai, 2017;Nelson, 2016), as well as the perceptions of other audiences to which scientists turn for resource acquisition and individual legitimation (Fini et al, 2018a). The tensions between academic and commercial demands are found to be more problematic at an individual rather than at an organizational level (Ambos et al, 2008).…”

Made in Academia: The Effect of Institutional Origin on Inventors’ Attention to Science

“…The findings of academic scientists are not primarily evaluated for their practical usefulness. Conversely, inventors do not assess scientific discoveries chiefly for their contribution to fundamental understanding (Fini, Jourdan, and Perkmann 2017).…”