2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0268416019000109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social vulnerability, social structures and household grain shortages in sixteenth-century inland Flanders

Abstract: Abstract‘Vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’ have recently become hot topics in historiography. The main focus is on systemic vulnerability: the reasons why certain societies were better able to overcome crisis. In this article I want to address another type of vulnerability – inspired by the insights of Wisner and Blaikie: social vulnerability, and the differentiated impact of crisis on different social groups. Based on a unique corpus of sources – the grain censuses drafted during the grain crisis of 1556/57 – a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Famine vulnerability is understood as a dynamic process on various scales induced by a range of geographic, economic, and social factors such as environmental conditions, population pressure, degree of proto‐industrialization, market dependence, and impoverishment of population (Collet, 2012; Dijkman & van Leeuwen, 2019; Krämer, 2015; Lassen, 2016). Furthermore, a society as a whole can be comparatively resilient to food shortage whereas certain groups within the same society can be vulnerable (Huhtamaa et al, 2022; van Onacker, 2019). Clearly, societal resilience to food crises increased in Europe over time albeit not in a linear fashion (Campbell, 2010).…”
Section: Causes Of Faminementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Famine vulnerability is understood as a dynamic process on various scales induced by a range of geographic, economic, and social factors such as environmental conditions, population pressure, degree of proto‐industrialization, market dependence, and impoverishment of population (Collet, 2012; Dijkman & van Leeuwen, 2019; Krämer, 2015; Lassen, 2016). Furthermore, a society as a whole can be comparatively resilient to food shortage whereas certain groups within the same society can be vulnerable (Huhtamaa et al, 2022; van Onacker, 2019). Clearly, societal resilience to food crises increased in Europe over time albeit not in a linear fashion (Campbell, 2010).…”
Section: Causes Of Faminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, improvements at one level could increase the vulnerability (through extreme poverty) of certain groups at another level, for example during the “agricultural revolution” of the 18th century (Collet, 2019; Desai, 1991). Historical scholarship has therefore tended to analyze pre‐famine institutional stability, socio‐economic conditions, (in)action of the ruling classes, and relief measures to understand the development and severity of different famines (Tilly, 1983; van Onacker, 2019; Vanhaute, 2011; Voutilainen, 2016; Walter, 2019).…”
Section: Causes Of Faminementioning
confidence: 99%