Social welfare through guaranteed wage employment: experience of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in an Indian state

swain, Pranaya; Ray, Sthitapragyan

doi:10.1080/21699763.2013.809665

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To answer the multiplicity of questions related to HEC, many dimensions of the problem need to be addressed. A pluralistic approach involving both cooperation and conflict among the various parties involved could better suit the needs here (Swain & Ray, 2013). Mining and quarrying close to the sanctuary area must be controlled.…”

Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From fear to festivity: Multi‐stakeholder perspectives onhuman‐elephantconflict and coexistence in India

Nayak

swain

2020

J Public Affairs

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humans and elephants have shared social, historical and ecological relations for ages. However, their interactions have not been as pleasant as one would like that to be. Although the problems associated with human‐elephant conflict (HEC) are widely known, the increasing rate and extent of conflicts suggest that improved strategies are required to promote their co‐existence. Several measures such as compensation for loss of lives and livelihood, deployment of deterrents, erection of fences to restrict the movements, promotion of conservation education to reduce antagonism, preservation of forests and habitation, etc. have been adopted extensively to mitigate human‐elephant conflict and foster coexistence. Despite persistent efforts, the problem refuses to wither away. Stakeholders' perceptions and attitudes also vary widely across the categories. Many studies show that the impacts of human‐elephant conflict penetrate far deeper than the immediate threats from each other. This paper attempts to understand the plurality of stakeholders' connect with elephants, their perceptions, effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies and future of their coexistence, drawing from empirical data. On the basis of inputs from key informants, focus group discussions among community members and Forest Department officials and field observations from one of the migratory elephant corridors of India, we locate mixed perspectives from various stakeholders and their experiences and responses to human‐elephant conflict which, as we envisage, will go a long way in designing participatory and community‐based mitigation strategies.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%