2019
DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2019.1616685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social work teaching partnerships: a discussion paper

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this may seem an impressive accomplishment in isolation, if also suggests that Think Ahead are using their political connections and financial power to monopolise these placements to the detriment of students from other routes, while also openly disparaging mainstream programmes in a way that may discourage applicants. This is a real concern, and the negative impact that fast-tracks are having on the availability of placements and practice educators for students on mainstreams has been recognised in research (Baginsky et al, 2019). As another example of this competitive marketing approach by fast-tracks, Frontline utilise a strategy of hiring university students as 'brand managers', who actively recruit for the Frontline programme on university campuses, including universities that have social work programmes themselves (Frontline, n.d.).…”
Section: Damage Of Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this may seem an impressive accomplishment in isolation, if also suggests that Think Ahead are using their political connections and financial power to monopolise these placements to the detriment of students from other routes, while also openly disparaging mainstream programmes in a way that may discourage applicants. This is a real concern, and the negative impact that fast-tracks are having on the availability of placements and practice educators for students on mainstreams has been recognised in research (Baginsky et al, 2019). As another example of this competitive marketing approach by fast-tracks, Frontline utilise a strategy of hiring university students as 'brand managers', who actively recruit for the Frontline programme on university campuses, including universities that have social work programmes themselves (Frontline, n.d.).…”
Section: Damage Of Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWTP is a Department of Education (DfE) funded scheme and designed to strengthen social work education. The primary aim is to teach social work students collaboratively whilst on placement, to better prepare them for the workplace, through being practice-focussed and arguably, employer-led (Baginsky et al, 2019). Although the idea of relationships between local authorities and universities is not new (Munro, 2011), the collaboration has brought resources and a stakeholder commitment to work in partnership focussing towards increasing quality social work training throughout all levels within the organisations.…”
Section: Teaching Partnershipmentioning
confidence: 99%