2018
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1499614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social workers’ policy practice in Israel: internal, indirect, informal and role contingent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the practical level, the findings of this study can get in-depth understanding with the findings of a previous study that refer to the complexity of engaging in policy practice (Weiss-Gal et al 2020). The study findings show that although social workers engage in policy, this engagement is rather limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On the practical level, the findings of this study can get in-depth understanding with the findings of a previous study that refer to the complexity of engaging in policy practice (Weiss-Gal et al 2020). The study findings show that although social workers engage in policy, this engagement is rather limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Of these variables, RNs' administrative position, perceived policy skills, and perceived organizational support for policy involvement contributed the most to on‐the‐job policy involvement. These variables were also significant in previous studies that examined on‐the‐job policy involvement among frontline social workers in general hospitals in Israel (Weiss‐Gal, Gal, Schwartz‐Tayri, Gewirtz‐Meydan, & Sommerfeld, 2020), and the policy advocacy of nurses, social workers and medical residents employed in acute‐care hospitals in Los Angeles (Jansson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of asylum seekers entering Israel grew rapidly since 2007, and despite new needs for social work interventions, Israeli social work schools offered few courses focusing on asylum seekers (Tartakovsky and Walsh, 2016). The lack of preparation may reflect the fact that implementation of the human rights approach to social work and policy practice in Israel was still in its infancy, and it was limited in scope (Weiss-Gal and Gal, 2008;Nuttman-Shwartz and Ranz, 2017;Weiss-Gal et al, 2018). This also reflects a more general gap between repeated statements about the significance of human rights for the social work profession on the one hand and the professional reality on the other, in which the actual scope of social workers who implement policy practice and advocacy is limited (Kwong-Kam, 2012;Hawkins and Knox, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the fact that many, if not most, of Israel's social workers involved in working with the community of asylum seekers are employed directly either by the government or by specialised municipal services may also explain the limited, needs-based, focus of their activities. In that connection, a recent study revealed that the organisational context in which Israeli social workers operate is a significant factor influencing their level of willingness to engage in policy practice (Weiss-Gal et al, 2018). The adoption of a traditional needsbased paradigm and caring for urgent needs is not enough to secure the basic human rights of asylum seekers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%