Sociale informatieverwerking van kinderen met lichte verstandelijke beperkingen

Nieuwenhuijzen, M. van; Bijman, Elske R.; Lamberix, I. C. W.; Wijnroks, Lex; Castro, Bram Orobio de; Vermeer, A.; Matthys, Walter

doi:10.1007/bf03061027

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Aggressive social cognitions were assessed with a combination of the Social Problem Solving Test revised for children with MBID (SPT-MID; Van Nieuwenhuijzen et al 2001 ) and the Normative Beliefs About Aggression Scale (NOBAGS; Huesman and Guerra 1997 ). The Social Problem Solving Test asks for social problem solving strategies in response to five hypothetical situations on video-tape.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of an Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior and Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Trial

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Standing Strong Together (SST), a combined group based parent and child intervention for externalizing behavior in 9–16 year-old children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID). Children with externalizing behavior and MBID (IQ from 55 to 85) (N = 169) were cluster randomly assigned to SST combined with care as usual or to care as usual only. SST led to a significant benefit on teacher reported but not on parent reported externalizing behavior. SST had significant effects on parent rated positive parenting and the parent–child relationship. The present study shows that a multicomponent group based intervention for children with MBID is feasible and has the potential to reduce children’s externalizing behavior and improve both parenting behavior and the parent–child relationship.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of an Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior and Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Trial

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on what this young man explained about "anger with love," we should understand two things. Firstly, he talks in crude terms about "anger" because that is how young people with his background and limitations express themselves regarding emotions and social behavior (van Nieuwenhuijzen et al, 2007). Therefore, "anger" in his terms covers a broad range of actions, from a person clearly letting you know they are not amused and rather cross with you, to someone bursting into a raging fury.…”

Section: Defining and Conceptualizing "Anger With Love"mentioning

confidence: 99%

Gangs in the Era of Internet and Social Media

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, because of limited social information processing as an executive function, people with MBID perceive more negative information, along with more difficulty remembering and processing information, limited working memory, and fewer problem-solving skills. The resulting stress makes learning mentalizing abilities more difficult [11, 12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities of adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: a parallel superiority randomized controlled trial

Derks

Wijngaarden²,

Wouda

et al. 2019

Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Persons with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities generally show dysfunctions in mentalization and stress regulation, resulting in problematic social relationships and personal distress. Intervention programs may improve mentalizing abilities. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities and stress regulation in adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Methods A two-arm, parallel, superiority randomized controlled trial will be used with 172 adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group to play the serious game ‘You & I’ or a waitlist control group. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post intervention (5 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (6–8 weeks after post intervention). They also will fill in questionnaires for personal factors, personal development, personal well-being, social validity, autism spectrum quotient (demographic variables), mentalizing abilities (primary outcome measure), and stress regulation (secondary outcome measure). Discussion The serious game ‘You & I’ aims to improve mentalizing abilities in adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities, which is expected to lead to improved regulation of stress in social relationships. The study’s unique feature is the use of a serious game to improve mentalizing abilities. If the intervention is effective, the serious game can be implemented on a broad scale in Dutch care organizations for people with intellectual disabilities as an effective preventive tool to improve mentalizing abilities. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7418 . Registered on 2 August 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3608-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Sociale informatieverwerking van kinderen met lichte verstandelijke beperkingen

Cited by 9 publications

References 29 publications

Effectiveness of an Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior and Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Trial

Effectiveness of an Intervention for Children with Externalizing Behavior and Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities: A Randomized Trial

Gangs in the Era of Internet and Social Media

Effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities of adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: a parallel superiority randomized controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About