Sociality Mental Modes Modulate the Processing of Advice-Giving: An Event-Related Potentials Study

Jin, Li; Zhan, Youlong; Fan, Wei; Liu, Lei; Mei, Li; Sun, Yu; Zhong, Yiping

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00042

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Skills training in these areas is a vital component of several established treatment methods directed to individuals with emotion regulation difficulties and subsequent disruptive behaviors, such as dialectical behavior therapy ( McCann et al, 2000 ; Brown et al, 2013 ) or emotion regulation group therapy ( Gratz and Gunderson, 2006 ; Gratz and Tull, 2011 ). Recently, the concept of eHealth has gained increasing support in forensic psychiatry ( Kip et al, 2018 ), where developments in virtual reality technology for skills training (e.g., aggression management; Tuente et al, 2018 ; Klein Tuente et al, 2020 ) have been especially promising. However, while these could provide completely new arenas for skills training in emotion and behavior regulation for forensic psychiatric patients, there remains a great need for research on effective treatment components.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotion Regulation and Self-Harm Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emotion regulation has been specifically linked to both non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and attempted suicide. It is also known that self-harm is disproportionally higher (30–68.4%) in forensic samples than in the general population, yet knowledge about the association between emotion regulation and self-harm in forensic settings is scarce. The purpose of this study was to describe emotion regulation in a sample of forensic psychiatric patients, to explore dimensions and levels of emotion regulation between forensic psychiatric patients with and without self-harm, and to explore associations between forensic psychiatric patients’ self-reported emotion regulation and self-reported functions of NSSI. A cohort of forensic psychiatric inpatients (N=98) was consecutively recruited during 2016–2020 from a high-security forensic psychiatric clinic in Sweden. Data were collected through the self-report measures Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS). In relation to the first aim, median total and subscales scores for DERS were reported. Results showed a statistically significant difference in emotion regulation between participants with and without self-harm (p=0.004), with a medium effect size (Cohen’s d=0.65) for the DERS total scale. The DERS subscales returned large differences for Impulse (p=0.001, d=0.86), Goals (p=0.014, d=0.58), and Strategies (p=0.012, d=0.54) between participants with and without self-harm. Finally, DERS scores were correlated with both the interpersonal (rs=0.531, p<0.001, n=43) and intrapersonal factors (rs=0.503, p<0.001, n=43) of NSSI as reported on the ISAS. Participants with self-harm (NSSI and/or suicide attempts) demonstrated significantly more difficulties with emotion regulation than those without self-harm. Emotion dysregulation was associated with both interpersonal and intrapersonal functions of NSSI in the participants. We suggest further studies on forensic psychiatric patients’ maladaptive behaviors that focus on substance abuse, self-harm, and aggressive behaviors in relation to the regulation and expression of emotion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotion Regulation and Self-Harm Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Preferences motivate interpersonal behavior (Jeung et al., 2016). Previous evidence has shown that interpersonal behavior involving material rewards, especially monetary payoffs, is market‐oriented (Distefano et al., 2018; Heyman & Ariely, 2004; Li et al., 2020; Li et al., 2018). Specifically, interpersonal behavior involving monetary payoffs conjures up the market pricing mode , which is a fundamental behavioral mode of relating to others socially (Caruso et al., 2013; Fiske, 1992; Gasiorowska & Zaleskiewicz, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Specifically, interpersonal behavior involving monetary payoffs conjures up the market pricing mode , which is a fundamental behavioral mode of relating to others socially (Caruso et al., 2013; Fiske, 1992; Gasiorowska & Zaleskiewicz, 2020). The market pricing mode underlies the costs and benefits trade‐off analyses, in that a person is likely to focus on what he/she will receive in exchange equally before enacting a given behavior (Heyman & Ariely, 2004; Li et al., 2020; Li et al., 2018). Therefore, when engaging in actions involving monetary payoffs, individuals have a relatively stronger preference for reciprocity (Caruso et al., 2017; Cox & Deck, 2005; Vohs et al., 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monetary payoffs modulate reciprocity expectations in outcome evaluations: An event‐related potential study

Jin

Zhong

2021

Eur J of Neuroscience

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choosing cooperation or aggression relies on reciprocity preferences which refer to the tendency of an individual to return cooperative or aggressive action for cooperative or aggressive action (i.e., positive or negative reciprocity preference). The reciprocity preference is positively correlated with reciprocity expectation, wherein individuals with stronger reciprocity preferences may have higher expectations than future cooperative or aggressive behavior should be delivered by beneficiaries (positive reciprocity expectation) or victims (negative reciprocity expectation). Although previous studies have demonstrated that the presence of monetary payoffs enhances reciprocity preferences, the modulation of monetary payoffs in reciprocity expectations remains unclear. Using event‐related potentials (ERPs), we examined how monetary payoffs modulated reciprocity expectations by adopting the Chicken game. Participants were asked to choose between cooperation and aggression with a putative opponent in the Chicken game involving the monetary (vs. non‐monetary) payoffs. Participants’ electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded when they saw the opponent's cooperative or aggressive decision. Results showed that compared to the non‐monetary payoff trials, the feedback‐related negativity (FRN) effect in response to the opponent's decisions was stronger following the participant's aggressive decision in the monetary payoff trials, whereas P3 was insensitive to monetary payoffs. These findings suggest that monetary payoffs heighten expectations of negative reciprocity at the earlier and automatic outcome processing stage.

show abstract

“…Eye gaze and money are important social cues to prime sociality mental modes, which are closely related to reputation and benefit (Li et al, 2018). Many studies have shown that public behavior can bring people a good reputation and improve the social status of the helper in the group (Anderson & Kilduff, 2009;Willer, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seeking reputation or money? The influence of sociality mental modes on sense of agency in social contexts

duanxueer¹,

Zhong²,

liking³

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sociality mental modes (i.e., market mode primed by money cues and communal mode primed by eye gaze) refer to the ways people interact with others in distinct manners(individuals are inclined to share resources with others regardless of the personal costs and benefits in the communal mode but have a personal relationship with others based on cost-benefit ratios in the market mode), and they affect social interaction and even affect the subjective experience. The sense of agency (SoA) is a subjective experience of one’s degree of control over external events. But little is known about the influence of sociality mental modes on the SoA. Previous studies have shown that social exclusion reduces the SoA. Here, we examined whether sociality mental modes affect the sense of agency by intentional binding paradigm and 9-point Likert scale (experiment 1) in social contexts by priming social exclusion and social inclusion through a recall task (experiment 2). The results showed that in social exclusion conditions, the market mode group had a shorter estimate of time, and the communal mode group had a higher rating of agency than the control group. This study demonstrates that social inclusion context improves the explicit sense of agency. In the context of social exclusion and inclusion, the market mode enhances the implicit sense of agency, that is, pursuing money; the communal mode reduces the explicit sense of agency, that is, seeking reputation.

show abstract

Sociality Mental Modes Modulate the Processing of Advice-Giving: An Event-Related Potentials Study

Cited by 11 publications

References 67 publications

Emotion Regulation and Self-Harm Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients

Emotion Regulation and Self-Harm Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients

Monetary payoffs modulate reciprocity expectations in outcome evaluations: An event‐related potential study

Seeking reputation or money? The influence of sociality mental modes on sense of agency in social contexts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About