Socially assistive robotics and older family caregivers of young adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD): A pilot study exploring respite, acceptance, and usefulness

Abstract

Introduction The need for caregiver respite is well-documented for the care of persons with IDD. Social Assistive Robotics (SAR) offer promise in addressing the need for caregiver respite through ‘complementary caregiving’ activities that promote engagement and learning opportunities for a care recipient (CR) with IDD. This study explored the acceptability and usefulness of a SAR caregiver respite program responsive to feedback from both young adults with IDD and their older family caregivers (age 55+). Method Young adults with IDD and caregiver dyads (N = 11) were recruited. A mixed methods research design was deployed in three phases: Phase I with four focus groups to inform the program design; Phase II for program demonstration and evaluation with pre- and post-surveys; and Phase III with post-program interviews for feedback and suggestions. Results Both young adults with IDD and their caregivers scored favorably the social presence of, social engagement, and satisfaction with robot Pepper. Though there was no significant improvement of caregiving burden/stress as well as well-being of the young adults with IDD based on surveys, results from interviews suggested that the SAR may offer physical/emotional respite to caregivers by providing companionship/friendship as well as promoting independence, safety/monitoring, and interactive engagement with children. Discussion SAR has potential in providing respite for older family caregivers. Future studies need a longer program design and larger sample size to develop a promising intervention and test its feasibility and efficacy.

Robotic Animal Use among Older Adults Enrolled in Palliative or Hospice Care: A Scoping Review and Framework for Future Research

“…Trustworthiness, compassion, and humanity are integral to any interventions designed for successful human-social robot interaction [57]. Moreover, socially assistive robots should be used as a complement to, rather than a substitution for, human companionship [58] as there are concerns that robots could worsen social isolation [9]. Like Hudson and colleagues [28], we also argue against the use of robotic pets in palliative care or hospice in ways that are deceptive, that reduce or replace human contact, or that infantilize persons at the end-of-life.…”

Robots for Elderly Care: Review, Multi-Criteria Optimization Model and Qualitative Case Study

“…Robotics has the potential to solve the demand for caregiver respite by promoting involvement and training environments for care recipients through 'complementary caregiving' activities. Robots may also provide caretakers with physical/emotional respite by giving companionship/friendship, as well as empowering individuals, safety/monitoring, and interactive participation [74].…”

Smart Cities for People with IDD - Foundations for Digitally Inclusive Healthcare Ecosystems

“…For the care of people with IDD, the necessity for caregiver respite is well-documented. For example, through "complementary caregiving" activities that encourage involvement and educational possibilities for a care recipient (CR) with IDD, Social Assistive Robotics (SAR) hold promise in alleviating the need for caregiver respite [32]. In other cases, the use of robots could be an agent of personal privacy and dignity for those with intellectual disabilities, who need ongoing assistance with everyday activities [33].…”