2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0176-2680(02)00118-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially optimal monetary policy institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An 9 Acocella and Ciccarone (1997) generalize the above result by taking into consideration also public debt. Jerger (2002) demonstrates also in a different setting that the traditional paradigm of classical dichotomy does not hold if wage setters are inflation averse. 10 See Cukierman (2004) for a survey.…”
Section: Two Fundamental Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An 9 Acocella and Ciccarone (1997) generalize the above result by taking into consideration also public debt. Jerger (2002) demonstrates also in a different setting that the traditional paradigm of classical dichotomy does not hold if wage setters are inflation averse. 10 See Cukierman (2004) for a survey.…”
Section: Two Fundamental Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(, ) and Soskice and Iversen (, ) have shown that a conservative central banker can be beneficial also because he eliminates negative wage externalities in decentralized wage‐setting systems . However, the conservative central banker is only an imperfect substitute for the lack of union coordination, and wage centralization is a Pareto superior solution (Jerger, ; Acocella et al . ) .…”
Section: The Different Institutions For Dealing With the Social Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See inter alia Detken and Gärtner (), Gylfason and Lindbeck (), Cubitt (), Guzzo and Velasco (), Cukierman and Lippi (, ), Jerger (), Lippi (), Coricelli et al . (, ), Efthimiadis (), Acocella et al .…”
unclassified
“…If monetary policy would simply react such that prices rise in proportion to nominal wages, no real variable would be affected, of course. As it is well known, monetary policymakers may react with expansion or contraction to a wage hike, depending to what extent they aim to stabilize nominal or real variables (see Jerger (2002) for an account of models with endogenous monetary policy).…”
Section: Different Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%