Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a rare and potentially life-saving intervention performed for trauma patients in extremis. EDT is rare at Canadian trauma centres because of our infrequent occurrence of penetrating trauma. This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes at a Canadian level 1 trauma facility and compare survival to large published datasets. Also, we evaluated the appropriateness of an EDT performed at our centre based on published national guidelines. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of all patients undergoing an EDT during their resuscitation in the emergency department. Records were identified using our trauma registry, and all charts were manually reviewed. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Over a 20-year period, 58 EDTs were performed with 6 (10.3%) survivors. Patients undergoing an EDT secondary to penetrating trauma had the highest survival (5 of 24 patients or 20.8% survival) compared to patients undergoing an EDT for blunt trauma (1 of 34 patients or 2.9% survival). Patients undergoing an EDT who had not suffered cardiac arrest represented the group with the highest survival rate (3 of 6 patients or 50% survival). The majority of EDTs (79.3%) were indicated, and no patient undergoing an EDT survived if it was performed outside of published guidelines. Conclusions: Survival following an EDT in our small, regional trauma centre is consistent with survival rates from larger published datasets. An EDT should continue to be performed under accepted clinical indications. RÉSUMÉObjectifs: La thoracotomie pratiquée au service des urgences (TSU) est une intervention rare et potentiellement salvatrice chez les grands blessés qui arrivent dans un état gravissime au service des urgences (SU). La TSU est pratiquée rarement dans les centres de traumatologie en raison de la faible fréquence des traumas par pénétration. L'étude visait à évaluer les résultats de la TSU pratiquée dans un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 au Canada et à comparer la survie à celle relevée dans de grands ensembles de données publiés. De plus, les auteurs voulaient évaluer la pertinence de la TSU pratiquée dans leur centre en fonction des lignes directrices nationales, publiées. Méthode: Il s'agit d'un examen rétrospectif des dossiers médicaux de tous les patients ayant subi une TSU durant les manoeuvres de réanimation au SU. La recherche des dossiers s'est faite à l'aide du registre des traumas de l'établissement concerné, et tous les dossiers ont fait l'objet d'un examen manuel. Le principal critère d'évaluation était la survie au moment de la sortie de l'hôpital. Résultats: Sur une période de 20 ans, 58 TSU ont été effectuées, dont 6 (10,3 %) se sont révélées fructueuses. Les patients ayant subi une TSU à la suite d'un trauma par pénétration ont connu le plus haut taux de survie (5 patients sur 24 ou taux de survie de 20,8 %) comparativement aux patients ayant subi une TSU à la suite d'un trauma contondant (1 patient sur 34 ou taux de survie de 2,9 %). ...
Objective: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a rare and potentially life-saving intervention performed for trauma patients in extremis. EDT is rare at Canadian trauma centres because of our infrequent occurrence of penetrating trauma. This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes at a Canadian level 1 trauma facility and compare survival to large published datasets. Also, we evaluated the appropriateness of an EDT performed at our centre based on published national guidelines. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of all patients undergoing an EDT during their resuscitation in the emergency department. Records were identified using our trauma registry, and all charts were manually reviewed. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Over a 20-year period, 58 EDTs were performed with 6 (10.3%) survivors. Patients undergoing an EDT secondary to penetrating trauma had the highest survival (5 of 24 patients or 20.8% survival) compared to patients undergoing an EDT for blunt trauma (1 of 34 patients or 2.9% survival). Patients undergoing an EDT who had not suffered cardiac arrest represented the group with the highest survival rate (3 of 6 patients or 50% survival). The majority of EDTs (79.3%) were indicated, and no patient undergoing an EDT survived if it was performed outside of published guidelines. Conclusions: Survival following an EDT in our small, regional trauma centre is consistent with survival rates from larger published datasets. An EDT should continue to be performed under accepted clinical indications. RÉSUMÉObjectifs: La thoracotomie pratiquée au service des urgences (TSU) est une intervention rare et potentiellement salvatrice chez les grands blessés qui arrivent dans un état gravissime au service des urgences (SU). La TSU est pratiquée rarement dans les centres de traumatologie en raison de la faible fréquence des traumas par pénétration. L'étude visait à évaluer les résultats de la TSU pratiquée dans un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 au Canada et à comparer la survie à celle relevée dans de grands ensembles de données publiés. De plus, les auteurs voulaient évaluer la pertinence de la TSU pratiquée dans leur centre en fonction des lignes directrices nationales, publiées. Méthode: Il s'agit d'un examen rétrospectif des dossiers médicaux de tous les patients ayant subi une TSU durant les manoeuvres de réanimation au SU. La recherche des dossiers s'est faite à l'aide du registre des traumas de l'établissement concerné, et tous les dossiers ont fait l'objet d'un examen manuel. Le principal critère d'évaluation était la survie au moment de la sortie de l'hôpital. Résultats: Sur une période de 20 ans, 58 TSU ont été effectuées, dont 6 (10,3 %) se sont révélées fructueuses. Les patients ayant subi une TSU à la suite d'un trauma par pénétration ont connu le plus haut taux de survie (5 patients sur 24 ou taux de survie de 20,8 %) comparativement aux patients ayant subi une TSU à la suite d'un trauma contondant (1 patient sur 34 ou taux de survie de 2,9 %). ...
Objectives: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a rare and challenging procedure. Emergency medicine (EM) residents have limited opportunities to perform the procedure in clinical or educational settings. Standardized, reliable, validated checklists do not exist to evaluate procedural competency. The objectives of this project were twofold: 1) to develop a checklist containing the critical actions for performing an EDT that can be used for future procedural skills training and 2) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the checklist for performing EDT.Methods: After a literature review, a preliminary 22-item checklist was developed and disseminated to experts in EM and trauma surgery. A modified Delphi method was used to revise the checklist. To assess usability of the checklist, EM and trauma surgery faculty and residents were evaluated performing an EDT while inter-rater reliability was calculated with Cohen's kappa. A Student's t-test was used to compare the performance of participants who had or had not performed a thoracotomy in clinical practice. Item-total correlation was calculated for each checklist item to determine discriminatory ability.Results: A final 22-item checklist was developed for EDT. The overall inter-rater reliability was strong (j = 0.84) with individual item agreement ranging from moderate to strong (j = 0.61 to 1.00). Experts (attending physicians and senior residents) performed well on the checklist, achieving an average score of 80% on the checklist. Participants who had performed EDT in clinical practice performed significantly better than those that had not, achieving an average of 80.7% items completed versus 52.3% (p < 0.05). Seventeen of 22 items had an itemtotal correlation greater than 0.2. Conclusions:A final 22-item consensus-based checklist was developed for the EDT. Overall inter-rater reliability was strong. This checklist can be used in future studies to serve as a foundation for curriculum development around this important procedure.
Introduction Penetrating chest trauma (PCT) represents 10% of worldwide mortality, with developing countries counting as some of the most affected by high mortality rates due to cardiac trauma. Colombia is considered one of the most violent countries due to the high mortality rate associated with war and crime, hence the validation of an own classification for penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) is mandatory. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional study which included adult patients with PCIs at a level 4 trauma center in Colombia, between January 2018 and April 2020. We used our own system (Bogotá Classification) and compared it with traditional systems (e.g., Ivatury's, OIS‐AAST), by analyzing the mechanism of injury (MOI), the hemodynamic status of the patient at admission, the inpatient management, the individual outcomes, and some demographic variables. Bivariate statistical analysis, spearman correlation, and logistic regression were performed. Results Four hundred and ninety‐nine patients were included. Bivariate analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between mortality and hemodynamic state, MOI, its location and degree of lesion, cardiac/vessel injury, cardiac tamponade, time between injury and medical care, fluid reanimation, as well as the Ivatury's classification and the new classification (p < 0.005). The adequate correlation between Ivatury's and Bogotá classification supports the latter's clinical utility for patients presenting with PCI. Likewise, logistic regression showed a statistically significant association among mortality rates (p < 0.005). Conclusions The Bogotá classification showed similar performance to the Ivatury's classification, correlating most strongly with mortality. This scale could be replicated in countries with similar social and economic contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.