2019
DOI: 10.22323/2.18020204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Societal problem solver or deficient discipline? The debate about social science in the online public sphere

Abstract: This study uses the online discourse surrounding an Austrian publicly-funded study about "Islamic kindergartens" as a case study to approach communication about the social sciences in the online public sphere. Results from a discourse analysis of 937 user comments in online forums of two Austrian daily newspapers show that the social sciences are often referred to as a "special case". While some use this argument to neglect its societal relevance, others use it to highlight its role as societal problem solver.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the scientists may also engage publicly online by participating, for instance, by writing user comments [Huber, Wetzstein and Aichberger, 2019;Shanahan, 2010] and with this correcting misinformation online [Vraga and Bode, 2017]. Thus, scientists can function as professional gatekeepers.…”
Section: Levelling Of Epistemic Hierarchies: Changing Interaction Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the scientists may also engage publicly online by participating, for instance, by writing user comments [Huber, Wetzstein and Aichberger, 2019;Shanahan, 2010] and with this correcting misinformation online [Vraga and Bode, 2017]. Thus, scientists can function as professional gatekeepers.…”
Section: Levelling Of Epistemic Hierarchies: Changing Interaction Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although non-academic actors expect AHSS scholars to produce research that is highly relevant to policies, many AHSS researchers perceive their scholarly work as independent pursuits that offer critical descriptions and reflections of social phenomenon that may not necessarily generate instrumental outcomes (Burchell, 2009). The general public often have wide-ranging views about the roles of AHSS researchers, with some acknowledging the importance of AHSS expertise for society, while others questioning the independence of funded AHSS research (Huber et al, 2019). The public often do not ascribe the same amount of scientific rigor to AHSS research as they do to STEM research (Huber et al, 2019).…”
Section: Stem Versus Ahss Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general public often have wide-ranging views about the roles of AHSS researchers, with some acknowledging the importance of AHSS expertise for society, while others questioning the independence of funded AHSS research (Huber et al, 2019). The public often do not ascribe the same amount of scientific rigor to AHSS research as they do to STEM research (Huber et al, 2019). Moreover, STEM research outputs are more quantifiable than those of AHSS (Benneworth, 2015).…”
Section: Stem Versus Ahss Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, science also depends on public funding. Specific types of scientific research could be limited if people think that money invested in it is unnecessary or wasteful (Huber et al, 2019).…”
Section: Trust In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%