“…These studies have shown that risk ratings may substantially vary from one country to another. For example, the level of risk associated with the item "Nuclear Power" was rated 31 (out of 100; that is, not very risky) in a Hungarian sample (Englander, Farago, Slovic & Fischhoff, 1986), 34 in a Swedish sample (Nyland, 1993), 47 in a Norwegian sample (Teigen, Brun & Slovic, 1988), an Australian sample (Finucane & Maybery, 1996), and a Finnish sample (Mullet, Lazreg, Candela & Neto, 2005), 49 in a Polish sample (Goszcynska, Tyszka & Slovic, 1991), 62 in an Italian sample , 66 in a Macanese sample (Neto & Mullet, 2001) and a Brazilian sample (Nyland, 1993), 67 in a Portuguese sample (Neto & Mullet, 2000), 68 in a Hong Kongese sample (Keown, 1989), 69 in a French sample (Karpowicz-Lazreg & Mullet, 1993) and a Russian sample (Rodionova, Vinsonneau, Rivière & Mullet, 2007), 72 in a US sample (Slovic, Fischhoff & Lichtenstein, 1985) and a Korean sample (Cha, 2000), 78 in a Burkina Faso sample (Koné & Mullet, 1994), 79 in an Egyptian sample (Ahmed, Macri & Mullet, 2006) and a Kuwaiti sample (Ahmed & Mullet, 2007), 84 in a Spanish sample (Muñoz Sastre, Gatelier, Portell, Neto & Mullet, 2006), and 89 in a Greek sample (Macri & Mullet, 2007).…”