Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977-2004).

Abstract

On the basis of K. Stenner's (2005) authoritarian dynamic theory, it was hypothesized that the number of death sentences and executions would be higher in more threatened conservative states than in less threatened conservative states, and would be lower in more threatened liberal states than in less threatened liberal states. Threat was based on state homicide rate, violent crime rate, and non-White percentage of population. Conservatism was based on state voter ideological identification, Democratic and Republican Party elite liberalism-conservatism, policy liberalism-conservatism, religious fundamentalism, degree of economic freedom, and 2004 presidential election results. For 1977-2004, with controls for state population and years with a death penalty provision, the interactive hypothesis received consistent support using the state conservatism composite and voter ideological identification alone. As well, state conservatism was related to death penalties and executions, but state threat was not. The temporal stability of the findings was demonstrated with a split-half internal replication using the periods 1977-1990 and 1991-2004. The interactive hypothesis and the results also are discussed in the context of other threat-authoritarianism theories and terror management theory.

The effects of mortality salience on political preferences: The roles of charisma and political orientation

“…The support found here for the charisma orientation-match hypothesis is consistent with prior TMT research on political attitudes, which typically shows that MS effects are moderated by political orientation (Greenberg et al, 1992;McCann, 2008;McGregor et al, 1998;Pyszczynski et al, 2006;Weise, Arciszewski, Verlhiac, Pyszczynski, & Greenberg, submitted for publication). It is also consistent with, Cohen et al's (2004) finding that MS heightened support for a hypothetical charismatic candidate whose political orientation was unspecified.…”

Big Five Personality and Residential Mobility: A State-Level Analysis of the USA

“…Some readers also might be concerned that the sample was too small for multiple regression analysis, but similar strategies with small samples have succeeded in the past (e.g., McCann, 1992McCann, , 1997McCann, , 2008McCann, , 2014a. Most problems of multiple regression with small samples and several predictors stem from inference concerns regarding the instability of regression coefficients.…”

Personality and American State Differences in Obesity Prevalence

“…The criterion and database remained constant, composites reduced the number of predictors, each pool variable was a potentially viable predictor, and almost the whole population of states was included in the sample. Such strategies with small samples have been employed successfully in the past (e.g., McCann, 1992McCann, , 1997McCann, , 2008.…”