1979
DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830240402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Society for general systems research at twenty-five: What agenda for our second quarter-century?

Abstract: This article deals with the evolution of general systems thinking over the past quarter-century, as reflected in the annals of the Society for General Systems Research. Likewise, on the basis of that evolution, the author speculates as to how best we can now provide mechanisms for implementing the theory that has been developed. In this time of critical need for utilization of general systems thinking in man's affairs the world over, it is argued that the Society should now stress application as much as resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very pronounced in Europe, this trend was reinforced in the 1970's when some distinguished cyberneticists (Stafford Beer, Gordon Pask, Heinz von Foerster) joined the SGSR: this confusion was regularly denounced by other members of the society. 23 In his presidential address, Ericson (1979) felt the need to recall two major reasons that invalidated those identifications -the encompassing vocations of general systemology (in the "broad sense"), and the conceptual schemes and values that were specific to it:…”
Section: Bertalanffy's and Rapoport's Role As Editors Of General Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very pronounced in Europe, this trend was reinforced in the 1970's when some distinguished cyberneticists (Stafford Beer, Gordon Pask, Heinz von Foerster) joined the SGSR: this confusion was regularly denounced by other members of the society. 23 In his presidential address, Ericson (1979) felt the need to recall two major reasons that invalidated those identifications -the encompassing vocations of general systemology (in the "broad sense"), and the conceptual schemes and values that were specific to it:…”
Section: Bertalanffy's and Rapoport's Role As Editors Of General Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%