2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Endovascular Management of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The consensus rejected stent placement for isolated femoral, popliteal, or calf vein involvement, aligning with the European Society of Vascular Surgery and Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. 28,30 The unanimous agreement against stent placement in children mirrored the existing recommendations. 28 The importance of IVUS for stent assessment reached a consensus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…29 The consensus rejected stent placement for isolated femoral, popliteal, or calf vein involvement, aligning with the European Society of Vascular Surgery and Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. 28,30 The unanimous agreement against stent placement in children mirrored the existing recommendations. 28 The importance of IVUS for stent assessment reached a consensus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Limited evidence on stent usage contributes to the challenge of consensus building, aligning with the scarcity of specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, except those from the Society of Interventional Radiology. 14,28 In acute DVT with iliac vein compression, severe symptoms, and a preserved functional state, the experts recommended to consider stenting. Similar to the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines, they suggested stent placement after thrombolysis, emphasizing the need for patient discussion regarding long-term risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,17 Based on these analyses, which suggested that at least some outcomes of endovascular intervention may differ between patients with iliofemoral DVT versus isolated femoral-popliteal DVT, this key anatomic distinction has been incorporated into contemporary clinical practice guidelines. [82][83][84][85][86] Investigators of future thrombectomy studies should present the baseline anatomic extent of DVT using these definitions and may be well advised to focus on patients with acute iliofemoral DVT since they are at higher risk for adverse outcomes and have shown greater potential to benefit from endovascular intervention than patients with less extensive DVT. 81,87,88 Fourth, in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT in the ATTRACT trial, endovascular thrombus removal led to greater early (within 1 month) DVT symptom resolution, reduced PTS severity through 6 months, and venous QOL benefits that were most pronounced during the first 6 months of follow-up, compared with standard therapy alone.…”
Section: Mt For Acute Dvtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,17 Based on these analyses, which suggested that at least some outcomes of endovascular intervention may differ between patients with iliofemoral DVT versus isolated femoral-popliteal DVT, this key anatomic distinction has been incorporated into contemporary clinical practice guidelines. 82–86 Investigators of future thrombectomy studies should present the baseline anatomic extent of DVT using these definitions and may be well advised to focus on patients with acute iliofemoral DVT since they are at higher risk for adverse outcomes and have shown greater potential to benefit from endovascular intervention than patients with less extensive DVT. 81,87,88…”
Section: Mt For Acute Dvtmentioning
confidence: 99%