2014
DOI: 10.5551/jat.21_sup.1-s9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-Demographic Factors and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Filipinos from the LIFECARE Cohort

Abstract: MetS is common in the Philippines among older, educated, and urban residents. The mNCEP criteria identified more MetS than the IDF criteria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of underweight, micronutrient deficiency/insufficiency, and cardiometabolic risk factors in this study were comparable with national estimates and past literature ( 34 – 36 ). Notably, overweight was twice higher than underweight in the adult population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The prevalence of underweight, micronutrient deficiency/insufficiency, and cardiometabolic risk factors in this study were comparable with national estimates and past literature ( 34 – 36 ). Notably, overweight was twice higher than underweight in the adult population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another study conducted on the prevalence of MetS using both International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and National Cholesterol Education Program (mNCEP) III criteria concurred with the findings of the study on cardiovascular risk factors, providing evidence that MetS was more common in higher socioeconomic groups and urban areas in the Philippines, as opposed to developed countries which have an inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and MetS. 24–26 …”
Section: What Has It Found? Key Findings and Publicationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The remaining 284 studies were evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Thirty-four papers were included in the final review with 11 studies ( Bener et al, 2010 , Silveira et al, 2010 , Gavrila et al, 2011 , Gündogan et al, 2009 , Hildrum et al, 2007 , Huang et al, 2007 , Li et al, 2010 , Martins et al, 2015 , Mikkola et al, 2007 , Sy et al, 2014 , Tope et al, 2013 ) providing MetSyn data based on multiple definitions. Data from 26,609 different people aged between 18 and 30 years from 17 countries were available for analysis – see table for individual and grouped prevalence data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%