2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-demographic profiles and obstetrics outcomes of pregnant women with epilepsy in a vulnerability State, Brazil

Abstract: Introduction The socio-demographic profile of pregnant women in low- and middle- income countries is characterized by low educational attainment and unemployment, leading to social and economic morbidity. characterized by limited opportunities for education, employment, and marriage, which are strongly related to the stigmatization of the disease. The study of the socio- profile and obstetric outcomes of pregnant women with epilepsy in Alagoas, Brazil, may help understand this scenario and facilitate the devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the study by de Lima Leite et al (2022), which used the same population cohort as our study, found a statistically signi cant association of miscarriage when comparing PWWE/PWNE; however, we found no association between this outcome and the use or nonuse of ASM [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the study by de Lima Leite et al (2022), which used the same population cohort as our study, found a statistically signi cant association of miscarriage when comparing PWWE/PWNE; however, we found no association between this outcome and the use or nonuse of ASM [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the study by de Lima Leite et al (2022), which used the same population cohort as our study, found a statistically signi cant difference in the rates of miscarriage between PWWE/PWNE; however, we found no association between this outcome and the use or non-use of ASM [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…There were 45 retrospective 3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15]19,20,[22][23][24][25] and 21 prospective 11, [16][17][18]21,26,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] cohort studies, 9 case-control studies, 4,12,75-81 and 1 cross-sectional study. 82 Sixty-two articles had a low risk of bias 3-11, 13-16, 18-26, 31-40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 50-60, 62-71,74-77,79 and 14 a high risk of bias 12,17,41,43,44,47,49,61,72,73,78,[80][81][82] (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 45 retrospective and 21 prospective cohort studies, 9 case-control studies, and 1 cross-sectional study . Sixty-two articles had a low risk of bias and 14 a high risk of bias (eTable 2 in Supplement 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation