2022
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-21-00072.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-Ecological Analysis to Assess the Success of Artificial Reef Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, some artificial reefs in the southeastern United States have been designated as special management zones, where high-efficiency gear is now restricted to help prevent inequitable fishing and overexploitation. Careful consideration of artificial reef seascape effects and their interplay with management strategies will be a key area for future socio-ecosystem research 26,33 , especially given the increasing emphasis on restoration amidst the increasing artificial reef footprint.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, some artificial reefs in the southeastern United States have been designated as special management zones, where high-efficiency gear is now restricted to help prevent inequitable fishing and overexploitation. Careful consideration of artificial reef seascape effects and their interplay with management strategies will be a key area for future socio-ecosystem research 26,33 , especially given the increasing emphasis on restoration amidst the increasing artificial reef footprint.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehvar et al, 2018), but is nonetheless essential to support or challenge economic justifications by enabling cost-benefit analysis (Fairchild et al, 2022). Economic values include societal benefits via greater knowledge gained of GGI (Strain et al 2019), a perceived increase in naturalness and biodiversity, as well as an association with healthy environments (Fairchild et al, 2021;Salaün et al, 2022). Perspectives may, however, vary among stakeholders and regions; hence further studies are required for a more comprehensive understanding of perceived benefits and potential social and ecological conflicts in implementing GGI (Morris et al, 2016;Pearson et al, 2016;Kienker et al, 2018;Salaün et al, 2022;Aguilera et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Greater Consideration For Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…measurable benefits for humans and nature. The authors suggested that much could be learnt from the artificial reef literature, a more established discipline subject to intense critical evaluation (e.g., Pioch et al, 2011;Castello y Tickell et al, 2019;Komyakova et al, 2021;Reis et al, 2021;Vivier et al, 2021b;Bartholomew et al, 2022;Salaün et al, 2022) can increase fish production, including commercially-important species, by providing refuge, breeding sites and increased feeding opportunities (Pondella et al, 2002;Cresson et al, 2014;Roa-Ureta et al, 2019;Folpp et al, 2020). ARs can provide additional hard-bottom habitat as attachment sites for commercially-important bivalves (Goeltz et al, 2020) and important habitatforming species like macroalgae and corals (Campos et al, 2020, Higgins et al, 2022.…”
Section: Boxes Box 1 the Palm Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation