In thermodynamic theory, free energy (i.e., available energy) is the concept facilitating the
combined applications of the theory’s two fundamental laws, the first and the second laws
of thermodynamics. The critical step was taken by Kelvin, then by Helmholtz and Gibbs—
that in natural processes, free energy dissipates spontaneously. With the formulation of
the second law of entropy growth, this may be referred to as the dissymmetry proposition
manifested in the spontaneous increase of system/environment-entropy towards
equilibrium. Because of Kelvin’s pre-entropy-law formulation of free energy, our concept
of free energy is still defined, energy-centrally, as body’s internal energy or enthalpy,
subtracted by energy that is not available within a framework on the premise of primacy
of energy, in which free energy dissipates spontaneously and universally. This primacy of
energy is called into question because the driving force to cause a system’s change is the
purview of the second law. This paper makes a case for an engineering thermodynamics
framework, instead, to be based on the premise of the primacy of dissymmetry over free
energy. With Gibbsian thermodynamics undergirded with dissymmetry proposition and
engineering thermodynamics with the dissymmetry premise, the two branches of
thermodynamics are unified to become classical thermodynamics.