2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also reveal that most independent smallholders interviewed, do care about environmental sustainability and want to improve their management strategies. These results reflect those of Saadun et al (2018), who have investigated smallholders in Malaysia, stating that the socio-ecological background needs to be considered when designing a certification scheme.…”
Section: Which Stakeholders Are Perceived As Important Within the Inssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results also reveal that most independent smallholders interviewed, do care about environmental sustainability and want to improve their management strategies. These results reflect those of Saadun et al (2018), who have investigated smallholders in Malaysia, stating that the socio-ecological background needs to be considered when designing a certification scheme.…”
Section: Which Stakeholders Are Perceived As Important Within the Inssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, smallholders, who are still regarded as the world's poorest farmers, have lost their prominent role within such certification schemes. Some studies have indicated difficulties for smallholders to properly access certification schemes (Saadun et al 2018;Azhar et al 2017;Azhar et al 2015;Brandi et al 2015). One possible factor here is that they have rarely been invited to take part in decisionmaking regarding governance processes (Gillespie 2012), meaning they are not considered essential stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallholder plantations generally lack infrastructure for water table monitoring and thus may have less intensive drainage than industrial plantations (Dommain et al, 2016). Whilst almost all of the industrial plantations are under monocropping, the smallholder plantations tend to plant other crops, with 39% of independent smallholders and 9% of managed smallholders in a recent survey planting another crop (intercropping) in their oil palm fields, out of 300 respondents in 6 different regions in Peninsular Malaysia (Saadun et al, 2018). In spite of industrial plantations' omission of intercropping due to the complexity in mechanizing farm management and potential lower yield of oil palm, smallholders tend to practice intercropping for subsistence and extra income between oil palm fruiting cycles (Nchanji et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies by Feintrenie et al (2010b) and Jelsma et al (2017a), among others, illustrate that smallholders generally do not have a conservationist attitude, and that many will opt to convert forest into oil palm if the opportunity presents itself. Where land for expansion is available and affordable, intensification is not a necessity, and the motivation to invest in better management is likely to be limited, unless other incentives (such as a price premium; Saadun et al, 2018) are in place. Intensification depends on increased investments in terms of capital (herbicides, fertilisers) and labour (harvesting, weeding) and increased resource use efficiency, and these in turn require a general interest in making investments, being efficient, and increasing profits from the side of the plantation owner.…”
Section: Lack Of Fit Of the 'Intensification' Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%