“…In this context, valuation studies can be helpful in understanding the value and benefits of using weather and climate information (such as SCF) to support decision‐making processes. Other areas such as, climate services (Adams, Eitland, Vaughan, & Wilby, ; Anderson et al, ; Clements, Ray, & Anderson, ; Ferguson, Finucane, Keener, & Owen, ; Perrels, Frei, Espejo, & Jamin, ), meteorological services (Frei & von, ; Hallegatte, ; Perrels et al, ; Pilli‐Sihvola, Namgyal, & Dorji, ), humanitarian response (Drechsler & Soer, ; Rodrigues et al, ; Stephens, Perez, Kruczkiewics, Boyd, & Suarez, ; World Food Programme, ) and disaster risk reduction and management (Hallegatte, ; Practical Action, ) have all highlighted the need for such valuations and the pursuit for this type of studies can be underpinned by a number of reasons, including (adapted from Anderson et al, ; Clements et al, ; Freebairn & Zillman, ): - Justify publicly expenditure in the provision of climate information and services. This is particularly relevant in the context of public services, such as those provided by the National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHS), where it is frequently argued the importance of ascertaining the benefits and services provided by NMHS and demonstrate how it supported better decision‐making and policy development in order to justify and secure sustained public investment.
…”