Socio-economic characteristics of SHG and non-SHG members

Abstract

In recent years, SHGs have become significant institutions for rural development. It is now being increasingly realized that instead of targeting the individual in the process of development, it would be more useful to adopt the approach of group development. The group approach makes available the collective wisdom and combined resources for any task. With this background, a critical study of the evaluation of the profile characteristics of the SHGs and Non SHG members was carried out. Hence the present study has been formulated with the objective i.e. to study the profile characteristics of SHG and Non SHG members. The purpose of the study was to compare the SHG and Non SHG members with respect to their profile characteristics. The diagnostic study was confined to 10 villages from which 90 SHGs and 90 Non SHG respondents were selected for the study. The result revealed that the independent sample ‘Z’ test showed that there was significant difference in the mean values of SHG members and Non SHG members in case of education, family size, social participation, land holding, annual income, material possession whereas, there was no significant difference in the mean values of SHG members and Non SHG members in case of age and marital status. SHG and Non SHG members, Self Help Groups, Profile characteristics, Mean value, Significant difference by 15.83 per cent respondents. Technique of light intensity pruning was fully adopted by 62.50 per cent of total respondents, partially adopted by 29.17 per cent of total respondents and not adopted by 08.33 per cent respondents.

Tribal Farming Dynamics: Investigating the Influence of Socio Economic and Psychological Attributes on Agricultural Information Management Practices

“…The cosmopoliteness is mainly based on outward orientation. Similar findings were reported by Prameela and Ravichandran (2004), Vinaya and Shivamurthy (2021), Bariya et al (2022), Jegoda et al (2022) and Patrick et al (2022).…”

Relationship Between Extent of Adoption of Jute Hyv and Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Farmers

“…Here, for educational level illiterate is valued 0 and for other categories viz. (literate without formal schooling, primary school, middle school, high school, higher secondary, diploma/ certificate course, graduate and above) was valued 1 likewise for type of family nuclear is valued 1 and joint is valued 0 and for rest of the variables farming experience, farm machinery and equipment, social participation similar procedure were followed by Hussain (2017), Saikia (2017), Patrick et al, (2022), Bariya et al, (2022), Gajera et al, (2022).…”