2005
DOI: 10.1080/13557850500168826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociocultural Perspective on Organ and Tissue Donation among Reservation-Dwelling American Indian Adults

Abstract: Sociocultural factors relevant to the personal and environmental context of the social ecological model influenced beliefs about organ and tissue donation among the Lakota people in this study. Outreach programs aimed at increasing donation need to respect traditional beliefs yet present the choice about organ and tissue donation within the cultural context. Telling the stories of community members affected by both diabetes and donation is important. Promoting family conversation is critical. Healthcare system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a qualitative study involving Lakota Sioux participants living on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, the following strategies were identified to address barriers to donation: 1) develop outreach programs respecting traditional beliefs while presenting organ and tissue donation within a cultural context, 2) communicate personal experiences of community members affected by both diabetes and donation, and 3) adequately prepare healthcare personnel with respect for traditional beliefs before approaching potential donor families (8). This study was subsequently followed with an intervention developed to address the barriers identified (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a qualitative study involving Lakota Sioux participants living on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, the following strategies were identified to address barriers to donation: 1) develop outreach programs respecting traditional beliefs while presenting organ and tissue donation within a cultural context, 2) communicate personal experiences of community members affected by both diabetes and donation, and 3) adequately prepare healthcare personnel with respect for traditional beliefs before approaching potential donor families (8). This study was subsequently followed with an intervention developed to address the barriers identified (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to reasons that require further investigation, the rate of consent for deceased organ donation is lower than the rate for other races nationally. Previous interviews with Lakota Sioux tribe members in South Dakota regarding deceased organ donation identified several recurring themes (8). Participants were aware of the need for organs due to the rising rates of diabetes, but were generally unaware of the organ donation process and expressed mistrust in the local health care systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much organ donation research (e.g. Fahrenwald & Stabnow, 2005;Molzahn, Starzomski, McDonald, & O'Loughlin, 2005) has highlighted the importance of culture in beliefs and attitudes about organ donation. As such, although not feasible in the current study, future research in an Australian context should explore the beliefs and perceptions related to living and posthumous organ donation of Indigenous Australians.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mistrust extends to beliefs about inequities in the organ allocation process such as wealthy or famous people being more likely to receive a transplant (Haustein & Sellers, 2004;Morgan et al, 2008) and organs being given to undesirable recipients who are considered to be responsible for their own illness (Haustein & Sellers, 2004;Hyde & White, 2009;Morgan et al, 2008;Skowronski, 1997). Although most Western religions support organ donation, needing an intact body for the afterlife and uncertainty about whether a religion permits donation have often been cited as reasons preventing donation (Arriola et al, 2005;Fahrenwald & Stabnow, 2005;Frates, Bohrer, & Thomas, 2006;Kececioglu et al, 2000;Lam & McCullough, 2000). Negative perceptions about organ donation have also been attributed to feelings of discomfort about one's mortality (Alvaro, Jones, Robles, & Siegel, 2005;Radecki & Jaccard, 1997;Yeung et al, 2000), fear of not really being dead when organs are procured (Hessing & Elffers, 1986-87;Kececioglu et al, 2000;Morgan et al, 2008), talking about death as bad luck or a jinx (Frates et al, 2006;Morgan et al, 2008), concerns about disfigurement or mutilation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although most Western religions support organ donation, needing an intact body for the afterlife and uncertainty about whether a religion permits donation have often been cited as reasons preventing donation (Arriola et al, 2005;Fahrenwald & Stabnow, 2005;Frates, Bohrer, & Thomas, 2006;Kececioglu et al, 2000;Lam & McCullough, 2000). Negative perceptions about organ donation have also been attributed to feelings of discomfort about one's mortality (Alvaro, Jones, Robles, & Siegel, 2005;Radecki & Jaccard, 1997;Yeung et al, 2000), fear of not really being dead when organs are procured (Hessing & Elffers, 1986-87;Kececioglu et al, 2000;Morgan et al, 2008), talking about death as bad luck or a jinx (Frates et al, 2006;Morgan et al, 2008), concerns about disfigurement or mutilation (e.g. being ''cut up'') (Sanner, 1994;Sque, Payne, & Clark, 2006), and organ donation as ''gross ''or ''disgusting'' (Morgan et al, 2008;Sanner, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%