2002
DOI: 10.2307/3090282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociodemographic Diversity, Correlated Achievement, and De Facto Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
134
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
134
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This research provides clear evidence that students are sorted to different types of peers (i.e., based on academic ability or race) and curricula within schools, especially at the middle and high school levels (Conger 2005;Gamoran 1987;Oakes 1985). The practice of ability grouping creates considerable variation in the average achievement levels of classrooms within schools (Gamoran 1993;National Education Association 1990) and contributes to racial or socioeconomic segregation within schools since minority and low-income students tend to have lower achievement (Gamoran 1987;Lucas and Berends 2002;Oakes 1985;Oakes and Guiton 1995). This body of research suggests that there are potentially large differences in student characteristics across classrooms within schools; however, less clear is the extent to which there is systematic sorting of teachers with different characteristics to courses that serve students of different abilities.…”
Section: Prior Research On Teacher Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research provides clear evidence that students are sorted to different types of peers (i.e., based on academic ability or race) and curricula within schools, especially at the middle and high school levels (Conger 2005;Gamoran 1987;Oakes 1985). The practice of ability grouping creates considerable variation in the average achievement levels of classrooms within schools (Gamoran 1993;National Education Association 1990) and contributes to racial or socioeconomic segregation within schools since minority and low-income students tend to have lower achievement (Gamoran 1987;Lucas and Berends 2002;Oakes 1985;Oakes and Guiton 1995). This body of research suggests that there are potentially large differences in student characteristics across classrooms within schools; however, less clear is the extent to which there is systematic sorting of teachers with different characteristics to courses that serve students of different abilities.…”
Section: Prior Research On Teacher Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in racially diverse schools, minority students are more likely than white students to be placed in lower level academic tracks which provide fewer opportunities to learn than higher level tracks (Eitle, 2002;Lucas & Berends, 2002;Mickelson, 2001Mickelson, , 2005Mickelson & Smith, 1999;Oakes, 2005;Southworth & Mickelson, 2007).…”
Section: Race and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These practices may partially explain why low-income and URM students who attend highly integrated schools take less intensive coursework than their counterparts who attend more segregated schools (Crosnoe, 2009;Kelly, 2009). As a result of de facto tracking, disadvantaged students who attend wellresourced high schools are not guaranteed access to rigorous courses that is equal to the access enjoyed by their more advantaged peers (Lucas & Berends, 2002).…”
Section: Access To Advanced Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%