Sociodemographic inequities in cervical cancer screening, treatment and care amongst women aged at least 25 years: evidence from surveys in Harare, Zimbabwe

Abstract

Background Cervical cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in Zimbabwe; however; access to screening and treatment services remain challenged. The objective of this study was to investigate socio-demographic inequities in cervical cancer screening and utilization of treatment among women in Harare, Zimbabwe. Methods Two cross sectional surveys were conducted in Harare with a total sample of 277 women aged at least 25 years. In the community survey, stratified random sampling was conducted to select 143 healthy women in Glen View, Cranborne, Highlands and Hopely communities of Harare to present high, medium, low density suburbs and rural areas respectively. In the patient survey, 134 histologically confirmed cervical cancer patients were also randomly selected at Harare hospital, Parirenyatwa Hospital and Island Hospice during their routine visits or while in hospital admission. All consenting participants were interviewed using a validated structured questionnaire programmed in Surveytogo software in an android tablet. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14 to yield descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression outcomes for the study. Results Women who reported ever screening for cervical cancer were only 29%. Cervical cancer screening was less likely in women affiliated to major religions ( p < 0.05) and those who never visited health facilities or doctors or visited once in previous 6 months (p < 0.05). Ninety-two (69%) of selected patients were on treatment. Women with cervical cancer affiliated to protestant churches were 68 times [95% CI: 1.22 to 381] more likely to utilize treatment and care services compared to those in other religions ( p = 0.040). Province of residence, education, occupation, marital status, income (personal and household), wealth, medical aid status, having a regular doctor, frequency of visiting health facilities, sources of cervical cancer information and knowledge of treatability of cervical cancer were not associated with cervical cancer screening and treatment respectively. Conclusion This study revealed few variations in the participation of women in cervical cancer screening and treatment explained only by religious affiliations and usage of health facilities. Strengthening of health education in communities including churches and universal healthcare coverage are recommended strategies to improve uptake of screening and treatment of cervical cancer.

Socioeconomic Disparities of Facility-Based Childbirth in Indonesia

“…The poorest women have the lowest utilization of health care facilities for childbirth. This is in line with the results of recent research in several countries that take the theme of socioeconomic disparity, namely in Zimbabwe (20), China (21), Spain (22), Germany (23), and USA (24)(25) (26).…”

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Patients as Regard to Tuberculosis

“…Chi-squared test was used to determine significance of relationship between variables. A p-value of <0.05 for 95% confidence interval was J Microbiol Infect Dis www.jmidonline.org Vol 10, No 1, March 2020 considered statistically significant [20]. Dependent variables analyzed were "Knowledge about TB", "Length of time spent before going to the hospital when they have symptoms of TB" and "Tendency to seek help in other facilities before going to the hospital when they have symptoms of TB".…”

Wealth-related inequalities of women’s knowledge of cervical cancer screening and service utilisation in 18 resource-constrained countries: evidence from a pooled decomposition analysis

“…The relationship between health care utilisation and socio-demographic characteristics has been widely addressed in the literature [26][27][28][29][30]. Low levels of knowledge and uptake of CC screening services are linked to low socio-economic status (SES) [23,27,31], poverty and poor economic development at the country level, and inadequate health services, such as limited health facilities, unaffordability of services, poor quality of cytology services and lack of culturally appropriate and acceptable screening methods [3, 8, 20-22, 26, 32-35].…”