2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociodemographic predictors of delayed- versus early-stage cervical cancer in California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, age was not a predictor of late presentation. This finding which contrasts with findings from earlier studies [ 8 , 10 , 16 ] agrees with a study in Uganda [ 4 ]. In terms of access to healthcare, active membership of the National Health Insurance Scheme was included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, age was not a predictor of late presentation. This finding which contrasts with findings from earlier studies [ 8 , 10 , 16 ] agrees with a study in Uganda [ 4 ]. In terms of access to healthcare, active membership of the National Health Insurance Scheme was included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous studies have shown that low socioeconomic status is associated with late presentation of cervical cancer [ 8 , 9 ]. In addition, other factors such as race, age at diagnosis [ 8 , 10 ], insurance status [ 11 , 12 ], marital status [ 4 , 13 ], educational status [ 14 ], place of residence [ 15 , 16 ], number of children [ 4 ] and screening practices [ 17 ] have been associated with the stage at presentation, which in turn affect survival rates. The ability to identify abnormal genital tract bleeding symptoms (post-menopausal bleeding or intermenstrual bleeding) can affect health seeking behaviour, while indicative results from previous screening, family history of cervical cancer, personal history of sexually transmitted infections and smoking contribute to the development of cervical cancer [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study reveals that socio-demographic factors, including the CCR ecologic SES index, predict utilization of chemotherapy and HCT among acute leukemia patients, although it does not distinguish between individual and potentially actionable characteristics included in the CCR nSES index. Although age, sex, race/ethnicity and marital status each could correlate with our ecologic nSES index, these demographic variables are not included in the index and have exhibited sufficient independence to distinguish their effects from the SES index in other studies [43,44]. Furthermore, multicolinearity between age, sex, race/ethnicity or marital status and our ecologic SES index was not detected in this dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Additionally, the HIV-uninfected group was slightly younger and less likely to be on social support. Given the association of cervical cancer with socioeconomic status, this difference could have also impacted our study 29, 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%