2014
DOI: 10.5958/j.2319-5886.3.1.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociodemographic profile of speech and language delay up to six years of age in Indian children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Abraham et al study found first born children at greater risk of language delay. 13 But the present study did not suggest any significant association between birth order or type of family. There was no association between maternal education and socio-economic status of the family with language development.…”
Section: No Statistically Significant Association Was Observed Betweecontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…12 Abraham et al study found first born children at greater risk of language delay. 13 But the present study did not suggest any significant association between birth order or type of family. There was no association between maternal education and socio-economic status of the family with language development.…”
Section: No Statistically Significant Association Was Observed Betweecontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Significant associations were detected with male gender and presence of positive family history. Male gender has been shown to be a risk factor by several authors in earlier studies (8,9,23,24). Those with a positive family history in the form of unclear speech, stuttering, late speaking and poor vocabulary, had nearly four times higher odds of suffering from speech and language abnormalities as compared to those with no family history.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are several biological and environmental factors such as prematurity, low birth weight, perinatal disorders, low income and low parental education which are found to be associated with speech and language delay (6)(7)(8). There is a large amount of data on the prevalence and risk factors of speech and language delay from the West, but relatively scanty data from India (6,7,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our study results Dharmalingam et al reported that children in 4 to 5 years were more affected followed by 5-6 years. 8,9 After shifting the test positivity (tool positivity) from one item delay to two item delay (LEST positive), it was noted that there was an increase of the sensitivity from 25% to 44% and test specificity showed an increase from 80% to 99%. For using LEST as a screening tool for delay in language, we selected two item delay as test positive accepting a lesser (out of the two options) sensitivity of 44% because of the relatively higher positive predictive value (PPV of 19% and 88%, respectively for one item delay and two item delay as the tool criteria positive) and lesser false positives in the screened sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Binu et al noted that there was a prevalence of 13.75% speech delay among children attending routine clinics. 8 Dharmalingam reported the prevalence to be 9.5%. 9 The language delay was more in the boys compared to girls with the male:female ratio of 2.2:1 which was similar to the study done by Binu et al where they found that male:female ratio of 1.3:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%