2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/593487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociodemographic Variation of Caries Risk Factors in Toddlers and Caregivers

Abstract: Objectives. Dental caries is the most common chronic childhood disease, with numerous identified risk factors. Risk factor differences could indicate the need to target caregiver/patient education/preventive care intervention strategies based on population and/or individual characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate caries risk factors differences by race/ethnicity, income, and education. Methods. We enrolled 396 caregiver-toddler pairs and administered a 105-item questionnaire addressing demog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The caries risk questionnaire initially included 143 items abstracted from existing caries risk instruments and relevant sociodemographic and clinical risk variables. These items were pilot tested in a 12-mo trial with a panel of 399 toddlers from an underserved urban U.S. population to identify risk factors to predict caries progression in primary health care settings (Eckert et al 2010; Fontana et al 2011). The pilot study defined “high risk” to include only children who developed and/or had lesions progress to cavitation (International Caries Detection and Assessment System score ≥3) or had fillings placed during the test period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The caries risk questionnaire initially included 143 items abstracted from existing caries risk instruments and relevant sociodemographic and clinical risk variables. These items were pilot tested in a 12-mo trial with a panel of 399 toddlers from an underserved urban U.S. population to identify risk factors to predict caries progression in primary health care settings (Eckert et al 2010; Fontana et al 2011). The pilot study defined “high risk” to include only children who developed and/or had lesions progress to cavitation (International Caries Detection and Assessment System score ≥3) or had fillings placed during the test period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the multifactorial nature of the caries process, and the fact that the disease is very dynamic (e.g., lesions can progress and/or regress), studies on risk assessment tend to be complex, with a multitude of variables challenging the prediction at different times during life (Twetman and Fontana, 2009). In addition, risk factors may vary based on race, culture, and ethnicity (Huntington et al, 2002;Shiboski et al, 2003;Eckert et al, 2010;Fontana et al, 2010). For a clinician, the concepts of risk assessment and prognosis are an essential part of clinical decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teeth were cleaned, dried, and assessed using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) criteria ( ICDAS Coordinating Committee 2012 ) by calibrated dental professionals. A self-reported 53-item questionnaire (DCR-007-Primary Caregiver Questionnaire) was used in the parental study ( Eckert et al 2010 ; Fontana et al 2011 ; Daly et al 2016 ; Fontana et al 2019 ). Only general questions (demographics, delivery mode, Medicaid) about the child and the caregiver were included in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%