2012
DOI: 10.1134/s2079970512040090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioecological consequences of the transformation of natural resource utilization in Russia’s eastern part in the post-Soviet period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the transformations between settlements with predominantly indigenous and predominantly Russian populations are evident. For example, in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, the former remained mostly intact, with only small decreases in population, while the latter disappeared entirely or were significantly depopulated (Litvinenko, 2012(Litvinenko, , 2013.…”
Section: Social Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the transformations between settlements with predominantly indigenous and predominantly Russian populations are evident. For example, in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, the former remained mostly intact, with only small decreases in population, while the latter disappeared entirely or were significantly depopulated (Litvinenko, 2012(Litvinenko, , 2013.…”
Section: Social Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These climate parameters influence human health, incidence of diseases, adaptation potential, and economic development in general. Furthermore, it is important to explore the interactions between the environmental change and post-soviet transformations of natural resource utilization in northern Eurasia in order to assess the complexity of their socioecological consequences at regional and local levels (Litvinenko, 2012;Tynkkynen, 2010). The population dynamics of the northern Russian regions in 1990-2012, and the linkage between intra-regional differences in population dynamics, spatial transformations of natural resources utilization, and ethnic composition of the populations should be clarified.…”
Section: Social Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the transformations between settlements with predominantly indigenous and predominantly Russian populations are evident. For example, in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, the former remained mostly intact, with only small decreases in population, while the latter disappeared entirely or were significantly depopulated (Litvinenko, 2012;.…”
Section: Social Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These climate parameters influence human health, tincidence of diseases, adaptation potential and economic development in general. Furthermore, it is important to explore the interactions between the environmental change and post-soviet transformations of natural resource utilization in northern Eurasia in order to assess the complexity of their socio-ecological consequences at regional and local levels (Litvinenko, 2012;Tynkkynen, 2010). The population dynamics of northern Russian regions in 1990-2012, and the linkage between intra-regional differences in population dynamics, spatial transformations of natural resources utilization and ethnic composition of the populations should be clarified.…”
Section: Social Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%