Socioeconomic and Sociodemographic Predictors of Cancer-Related Information Sources Used by Cancer Survivors

Abstract

With 14 million cancer survivors in the United States, identifying and categorizing their use of sources of cancer-related information is vital for targeting effective communications to this growing population. In addition, recognizing socioeconomic and sociodemographic differences in the use of cancer-related information sources is a potential mechanism for reducing health disparities in survivorship. Fourteen sources of information survivors (N = 519) used for cancer-related information were factor-analyzed to create a taxonomy of source use. The association between social determinants and use of these source types was analyzed in regression models. Factor analysis revealed 5 categories of information source use (mass media; Internet and print; support organizations; family and friends; health care providers), and use varied based on sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Higher education predicted increased use of all source categories except mass media. African American cancer survivors turned to health care providers as a source for cancer-related information less often than did White survivors. Social determinants predicted differences in the type of cancer-related information sources used. Providers and health communicators should target communication platforms based on the demographic profile of specific survivor audiences.

Disparities in Cancer Survivorship Indicators in the Deep South Based on BRFSS Data: Recommendations for Survivorship Care Plans

“…18 An investigation reported that among five categories of information source use (mass media, Internet and print media, support organizations, family and friends, and healthcare providers), higher education predicted the increased use of all source categories except mass media. 19 …”

Structuring Health in Colorectal Cancer Screening Conversations: An Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems

“…Much existing research has emphasized individual choice in behavior and individual responsibility for healthcare and preventive screenings, such as by emphasizing evidence-based care and individual stages of decision making (e.g., Jensen et al, 2014; Taylor, 2009). However, recent research points to the need to include social and cultural elements when designing behavior interventions because peoples’ abilities to take desired actions vary depending on socio-cultural and socio-economic factors (e.g., Alden et al, 2015; Blanch-Hartigan & Viswanath, 2015; Williams et al, 2013). …”

Surveillance rates for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B, and chronic hepatitis C based on Japanese claims database

“…Imaging tests such US, CT, and MRI are expensive without health insurance. In addition, surveillance rates might also reflect the relative homogeneity of the population (e.g., race and religion), which may influence socioeconomic status and lead to differences in patient behavior …”