2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00724-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic consequences of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injuries: a Danish nationwide register-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the high post-injury level of benefit receipt was probably partly influenced by the pre-injury level of sickness and disability benefits in the SCI sample (17%), which was elevated compared to controls (9%). This difference in pre-injury benefit status is in line with findings from a nationwide Danish register-based SCI study that showed approximately two times higher health care costs for persons with SCI two years before injury, compared to controls [ 25 ]. We found their explanation, that this might be related to ongoing disease in advance of non-traumatic SCI, and a traumatic SCI group that could be more accident-prone, both resulting in higher costs, plausible and relevant for our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our study, the high post-injury level of benefit receipt was probably partly influenced by the pre-injury level of sickness and disability benefits in the SCI sample (17%), which was elevated compared to controls (9%). This difference in pre-injury benefit status is in line with findings from a nationwide Danish register-based SCI study that showed approximately two times higher health care costs for persons with SCI two years before injury, compared to controls [ 25 ]. We found their explanation, that this might be related to ongoing disease in advance of non-traumatic SCI, and a traumatic SCI group that could be more accident-prone, both resulting in higher costs, plausible and relevant for our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Adverse consequences have been reported such as long-term stress ( 8 ), decreased health-related quality of life ( 9 11 ), burnout ( 12 ), and symptoms of anxiety and depression ( 13 , 14 ). In line with these results, recent studies have found that family members of individuals with SCI or TBI had higher healthcare use following the injury ( 3 , 15 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Adverse consequences have been reported such as long-term stress (8), decreased health-related quality of life (9)(10)(11), burnout (12), and symptoms of anxiety and depression (13,14). In line with these results, recent studies have found that family members of individuals with SCI or TBI had higher healthcare use following the injury (3,15). The caregiver group is heterogeneous, and furthermore different consequences of stroke, SCI, and TBI might affect caregivers differently, resulting in diverse and complex needs (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…An injury can affect family functioning in the long-term, with increased emotional burden, high frequencies of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and lower quality of life (QoL) reported up to 20 years after the injury [1,5,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Furthermore, despite the treatment provided from a formal health care system, informal care relies on family members, which can pose a significant caregiver burden [15,[18][19][20][21][22], causing an imbalance in the family system [2,23] and a threat to the family relationship [17,[24][25][26]. Increased levels of burden on family members can furthermore have an impact on their level of psychological distress, which can affect their ability to provide care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%