2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Considerations and Shared-Care Models of Cancer Care for Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer represents a major public health problem, with total cure remaining elusive for most cancer types (1,2). Chemotherapy resistance in patients with recurrent and advanced disease (3) and strong systemic toxicity, especially in elderly (4), have raised concerns over the progress of cancer therapy, making it necessary to change the paradigm in the search for new treatments, more effective and with milder adverse effects. Thus, alternative cell death pathways capable of killing apoptosisand therapy resistant cancer cells, have gained vast interest among cancer researchers, leading to the identification of autophagy and lysosomal cell death programs as attractive means to circumvent therapy resistance (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer represents a major public health problem, with total cure remaining elusive for most cancer types (1,2). Chemotherapy resistance in patients with recurrent and advanced disease (3) and strong systemic toxicity, especially in elderly (4), have raised concerns over the progress of cancer therapy, making it necessary to change the paradigm in the search for new treatments, more effective and with milder adverse effects. Thus, alternative cell death pathways capable of killing apoptosisand therapy resistant cancer cells, have gained vast interest among cancer researchers, leading to the identification of autophagy and lysosomal cell death programs as attractive means to circumvent therapy resistance (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models have been created to enhance assessment and management of frailty in older adults with cancer. In a recent review, 66 Dale and colleagues discuss four that have emerged in the United States. The first, the primary provider model, uses formally trained geriatric oncologists who perform an initial comprehensive assessment and manage all geriatric and oncology needs.…”
Section: Multidisciplinary Care Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model adopted by MSKCC (Fig 1) is based on the following: the large population of patients evaluated and treated; the subspecialization of the oncologists in a specific type of cancer, and the limited availability of clinicians (dually certified geriatric oncologists, board-certified geriatricians) who have expertise in the care of the complex problems faced by older patients with cancer. Models that have been successful in smaller institutions, like the primary provider model 14 in which the older patients are evaluated and treated by a dually trained geriatric oncologist, have tight limits in the number of patients that can be seen. In centers such as MSKCC, which has greater than 3,000 new registrations of patients older than age 65 years annually (in its Manhattan location only), this model would limit the expertise to an extremely small percentage of patients.…”
Section: Development Of a Geriatrics Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The need for collaboration between geriatrics and oncology has been recognized, but a uniform model to achieve it has not been established. [14][15][16] This article describes the model of care for older adults with cancer that was developedatMemorialSloanKetteringCancer Center (MSKCC); shares the lessons learned since its inception; and, more important, identifies barriers and tactics that were successful to overcomethese barriers during its development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%