Socioeconomic Disparities in Positive Airway Pressure Adherence

Crew, Earl Charles; Wohlgemuth, William K.; Sawyer, Amy M.; Williams, Natasha; Wallace, Douglas M.

doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2020.10.003

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The strengths of this study are the use of validated functional and objective sleep measures. Low SES is a strong predictor of poor PAP adherence [ 42 , 52 ] and we adjusted for both objective PAP adherence and SES using a comprehensive composite SES indicator, the SVI. This study is limited by using a combination of data from two different studies and significant participant drop-outs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Racial Differences in Functional and Sleep Outcomes with Positive Airway Pressure Treatment

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is unclear if the response to positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment is different between African American (AA) and European Americans (EA). We examined whether race modifies the effects of PAP on sleep and daytime function. We assessed Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, Psychomotor Vigilance Task and actigraphy in 185 participants with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea before and 3–4 months after PAP treatment. The participants were middle-aged (mean, 55.1 years), 83.8% men and 60.5% AA. Linear regression models were used to examine the effect of race on outcomes. The AA had smaller reductions in ESS (mean change (95% confidence interval, CI) AA, −2.30 [−3.35, −1.25] vs. EA, −4.16 [−5.48, −2.84] and frequency of awakenings (AA, −0.73 [−4.92, 3.47] vs. EA, −9.35 [−15.20, −3.51]). A race × PAP usage interaction term was added to the model to examine if the change in outcomes per 1 h increase in PAP usage differed by race. AA exhibited greater improvement in wake after sleep onset (β (95% CI) AA, −8.89 [−16.40, −1.37] vs. EA, 2.49 [−4.15, 9.12]) and frequency of awakening (β (95% CI) AA, −2.59 [−4.44, −0.75] vs. EA, 1.71 [−1.08, 4.50]). The results indicate the importance of race in evaluating outcomes following PAP treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%