Abstract:BackgroundThe struggle against social inequalities is a priority for many international organizations. The objective of the study was to quantify the cancer burden related to social deprivation by identifying the cancer sites linked to socioeconomic status and measuring the proportion of cases associated with social deprivation.MethodsThe study population comprised 68 967 cases of cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 2009 in Normandy and collected by the local registries. The social environment was assessed at an… Show more
“…Conflicting results emerged from these studies. However, our findings were consistent with two French population-based studies relying on cancer registries that failed to show any influence of socioeconomic deprivation on CRC incidence (Colonna and Sauleau, 2013;Bryère et al, 2014).…”
Section: Disparities In Colorectal Neoplasmssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although educational and socioeconomic inequalities in CRC mortality have been reported in France (Menvielle et al, 2007), studies on their impact on CRC incidence are scarce in France. Only two French studies were recently published showing no relationship between CRC incidence and socioeconomic environment (Colonna and Sauleau, 2013;Bryère et al, 2014). Studies from other western countries have provided only limited and inconsistent findings (Coughlin et al, 2006;Clegg et al, 2009;Donnelly and Gavin, 2011).…”
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of area deprivation and primary care facilities on colorectal adenoma detection and on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in a French well-defined population before mass screening implementation. The study population included all patients aged 20 years or more living in Côte d'Or (France) with either colorectal adenoma or invasive CRC first diagnosed between 1995 and 2002 and who were identified from the Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry and the Côte d'Or Polyp Registry. Area deprivation was assessed using the European deprivation index on the basis of the smallest French area available (Ilots Regroupés pour l'Information Statistique). Healthcare access was assessed using medical density of general practitioners (GPs) and road distance to the nearest GP and gastroenterologist. Bayesian regression analyses were used to estimate influential covariates on adenoma detection and CRC incidence rates. The results were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with their 95% credibility interval. In total, 5399 patients were diagnosed with at least one colorectal adenoma and 2125 with invasive incident CRC during the study period. Remoteness from GP [RR=0.71 (0.61-0.83)] and area deprivation [RR=0.98 (0.96-1.00)] independently reduced the probability of adenoma detection. CRC incidence was only slightly affected by GP medical density [RR=1.05 (1.01-1.08)] without any area deprivation effect [RR=0.99 (0.96-1.02)]. Distance to gastroenterologist had no impact on the rates of adenoma detection or CRC incidence. This study highlighted the prominent role of access to GPs in the detection of both colorectal adenomas and overall cancers. Deprivation had an impact only on adenoma detection.
“…Conflicting results emerged from these studies. However, our findings were consistent with two French population-based studies relying on cancer registries that failed to show any influence of socioeconomic deprivation on CRC incidence (Colonna and Sauleau, 2013;Bryère et al, 2014).…”
Section: Disparities In Colorectal Neoplasmssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although educational and socioeconomic inequalities in CRC mortality have been reported in France (Menvielle et al, 2007), studies on their impact on CRC incidence are scarce in France. Only two French studies were recently published showing no relationship between CRC incidence and socioeconomic environment (Colonna and Sauleau, 2013;Bryère et al, 2014). Studies from other western countries have provided only limited and inconsistent findings (Coughlin et al, 2006;Clegg et al, 2009;Donnelly and Gavin, 2011).…”
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of area deprivation and primary care facilities on colorectal adenoma detection and on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in a French well-defined population before mass screening implementation. The study population included all patients aged 20 years or more living in Côte d'Or (France) with either colorectal adenoma or invasive CRC first diagnosed between 1995 and 2002 and who were identified from the Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry and the Côte d'Or Polyp Registry. Area deprivation was assessed using the European deprivation index on the basis of the smallest French area available (Ilots Regroupés pour l'Information Statistique). Healthcare access was assessed using medical density of general practitioners (GPs) and road distance to the nearest GP and gastroenterologist. Bayesian regression analyses were used to estimate influential covariates on adenoma detection and CRC incidence rates. The results were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with their 95% credibility interval. In total, 5399 patients were diagnosed with at least one colorectal adenoma and 2125 with invasive incident CRC during the study period. Remoteness from GP [RR=0.71 (0.61-0.83)] and area deprivation [RR=0.98 (0.96-1.00)] independently reduced the probability of adenoma detection. CRC incidence was only slightly affected by GP medical density [RR=1.05 (1.01-1.08)] without any area deprivation effect [RR=0.99 (0.96-1.02)]. Distance to gastroenterologist had no impact on the rates of adenoma detection or CRC incidence. This study highlighted the prominent role of access to GPs in the detection of both colorectal adenomas and overall cancers. Deprivation had an impact only on adenoma detection.
“…A poor socio-economic status is associated with a higher risk of cervical cancer [24,25], as indicated by the high proportion of women from deprived areas in our sample. However, once the invasive cervical cancer is diagnosed, the French healthcare system seems rather egalitarian with no difference in the prognosis of cancer according to socio economic level.…”
“…That study assessed the link between socioeconomic environment and cancer incidence and was based on French cancer registry data [17]. The study population comprised 68,967 cases of cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 2009 in Normandy and collected by the local registries (Calvados cancer registry, digestive Calvados registry, Manche cancer registry, Malignant hematological Basse-Normandie registry and Multicentral mesothelioma registry).…”
Section: Correction Of Relative Risks For a French Aggregated Study Ementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.