“…Abandonment of cropland, which is one of the most important stages of forest transition, has been considered the outcome of industrialization and urbanization by forest transition theory (Barbier, Burgess, & Grainger, ; Grainger, ; Mather & Needle, ; Rudel et al, ). Rural–urban migration and the reduction in agricultural labour forces have been invoked as the main drivers leading to cropland abandonment of marginal areas in developed countries (Gellrich, Baur, Koch, & Zimmermann, ; Izquierdo, Angelo, & Aide, ; Izquierdo & Grau, ; Mather, ; Melendez‐Pastor, Hernández, Navarro‐Pedreño, & Gómez, ; Nanni & Grau, ; Rudel et al, ; Rudel, Bates, & Machinguiashi, ; Verburg, van Berkel, van Doorn, van Eupen, & van den Heiligenberg, ) and the mountainous regions of China (Shao, Zhang, & Li, ; Yan et al, ; Zhang, Li, Song, & Shi, ). Cropland abandonment has strong environmental and socio‐economic impacts and consequences, such as conflicting biodiversity changes (Izquierdo et al, ; Queiroz, Beilin, Folke, & Lindborg, ; Woodhouse, Good, Lovett, Fullerc, & Dolmana, ), carbon stock increase (Schierhorn et al, ; Shang, Cao, Guo, Long, & Deng, ; S. P. Wang et al, ), fire hazards (Moravec & Zemeckis, ), soil erosion (Cerda, ; Zeller, Bardgett, & Tappeiner, ), anabatic poverty (Khanal & Watanabe, ), and marginalization of historic agricultural landscapes (Elbakidze & Angelstam, ; EU, ).…”