Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes

Abstract

translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Regarding these commercial rights a non-exclusive license has been granted to the publisher. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Are women neglected in the EU agriculture? Evidence from Lithuanian young farmers

“…The paper focuses on Lithuania as a case study. The relatively high gender equality level ( Blomberg et al, 2017 ) has been reported for this Eastern European country even though certain limitations of the gender equality indicators have been identified ( Broer et al, 2019 ; Unterhalter and North, 2017 ; Mwiine, 2019 ). Agriculture can be seen as a sector with high likelihood of gender inequality ( Collins, 2018 ).…”

Long-run Trends in the U.S. SES-Achievement Gap

“…In the third analysis, Broer, Bai, and Fonseca (2019) employ psychometrically linked assessments in math and science administered by TIMSS to estimate trends in SES-achievement gaps for eleven countries including the United States between 1995 and 2015. They estimate 75-25 gaps on an SES index constructed from indicators of parent education, books in the home, and the presence of two education resources (computer and study desk).…”

A new perspective on the international achievement gap: is academic autonomy good for everyone?

“…This means that most of these studies mask age-specific gaps in exchange for overall yearly gaps for each country separately. Among the few studies which concentrate on age-specific gaps, there are already quite different results from the main ones discussed in Chmielewski (2019) and Broer, Bai, and Fonseca (2019). For example, Reardon and Portilla (2016) and Hanushek et al (2019) find a decrease in the gap and a static gap when focusing in a narrow set of ages 3 .…”