2017
DOI: 10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Segregation of Activity Spaces in Urban Neighborhoods: Does Shared Residence Mean Shared Routines?

Abstract: Residential segregation by income and education is increasing alongside slowly declining black-white segregation. Segregation in urban neighborhood residents’ non-home activity spaces has not been explored. How integrated are the daily routines of people who live in the same neighborhood? Are people with different socioeconomic backgrounds that live near one another less likely to share routine activity locations than those of similar education or income? Do these patterns vary across the socioeconomic continu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the urban residents have a greater probability of encountering more NCDs relative to their rural counterparts (univariate analysis and Model 1 in Table 3 ), the differences appear to be fully explained by within-neighborhood confounding. One possibility is that those with a higher risk of multimorbidity, such as white collars that undertake greater life pressure and live a sedentary lifestyle, tend to be nested in several neighborhoods where residents share similar socioeconomic status [ 57 ]. It’s unwarranted to compare our results in Model 2 with prior studies since most of them did not consider within-neighborhood variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the urban residents have a greater probability of encountering more NCDs relative to their rural counterparts (univariate analysis and Model 1 in Table 3 ), the differences appear to be fully explained by within-neighborhood confounding. One possibility is that those with a higher risk of multimorbidity, such as white collars that undertake greater life pressure and live a sedentary lifestyle, tend to be nested in several neighborhoods where residents share similar socioeconomic status [ 57 ]. It’s unwarranted to compare our results in Model 2 with prior studies since most of them did not consider within-neighborhood variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L.A.FANS is an ideal source of data for studying how neighborhood exposures matter for individual health and well-being in Los Angeles [e.g., 42 , 43 , 49 55 ]. A key advantage of the L.A.FANS is the availability of census tract identifiers based on where respondents live, in addition to several locations respondents frequent and spend time (i.e., activity spaces).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, existing hypertension research conceptualizes neighborhoods as only encompassing the residential context and does not consider the amount of time spent in individuals’ nonresidential spaces. This may be particularly salient in Los Angeles where compared with White individuals, African Americans and Latinos are more likely to live in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, as well as conduct their daily activities in disadvantaged, under-resourced, and racially isolated neighborhoods [ 42 , 43 ]. Studies also show that daily mobility is facilitated or restricted by adults’ race/ethnicity, SES, and the characteristics of their activity spaces, which further conditions the duration of exposure to home and away neighborhoods [ 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the significance of PM 2.5 emission exposure, researchers have devoted significant efforts to measuring disparities in the exposure of PM 2.5 emissions among social-demographic groups at the local, regional [7], and national levels [8,9]. Traditional understanding of disparate exposure, however, is largely based on empirical models and air quality data detected by environmental sensors that estimate the concentrations of air pollutants in different areas of a city [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%