2018
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1524379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic status and early childhood aggression: moderation by theory of mind for relational, but not physical, aggression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in terms of implications of the cross-cultural research for child development more broadly, in Western cultures IC has been consistently shown to predict theory of mind (i.e., the understanding that others have mental states such as beliefs, desires, etc., which can vary from person to person or within one person over time [39]) particularly during the early childhood years [31], which holds implications for children's social competence during early childhood and beyond; however, this predictive relation between IC and theory of mind has not consistently been demonstrated in cross-cultural samples to the same degree as in Western samples [40]. For example, a recent meta-analysis discussed that although IC and EF generally did predict theory of mind and mental state understanding across cultures, the strength of this prediction was weaker among studies assessing East Asian samples than several Western samples, including the USA, Canada, and Europe [31].…”
Section: Impacts Of Culture and Environment On Young Children's Inhibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in terms of implications of the cross-cultural research for child development more broadly, in Western cultures IC has been consistently shown to predict theory of mind (i.e., the understanding that others have mental states such as beliefs, desires, etc., which can vary from person to person or within one person over time [39]) particularly during the early childhood years [31], which holds implications for children's social competence during early childhood and beyond; however, this predictive relation between IC and theory of mind has not consistently been demonstrated in cross-cultural samples to the same degree as in Western samples [40]. For example, a recent meta-analysis discussed that although IC and EF generally did predict theory of mind and mental state understanding across cultures, the strength of this prediction was weaker among studies assessing East Asian samples than several Western samples, including the USA, Canada, and Europe [31].…”
Section: Impacts Of Culture and Environment On Young Children's Inhibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while some prosocial capacities may be highly promotive of positive peer relationships even in the absence of other prosocial capacities, it is likely that in most circumstances, prosocial capacities can be more or less desirable depending on how they jointly occur with a child's other prosocial capacities. For example, perspective‐taking may be highly beneficial when a child's prosocial patterns also include cooperation and concern for others, but highly detrimental to forming positive peer relations when a profile does not include these other capacities (Baker, Jensen, Moeyaert, & Bordoff, 2018; Bosacki, 2015; Schneider, 1999).…”
Section: Patterns Of Prosocial Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) has also been examined in previous studies. Previous research has found that low SES was associated with an increased risk of being an aggressor/bully (Baker et al, 2020; Tippett & Wolke, 2014). However, Baker et al (2020) found that low SES was related to high relational aggression, but not physical aggression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous research has found that low SES was associated with an increased risk of being an aggressor/bully (Baker et al, 2020; Tippett & Wolke, 2014). However, Baker et al (2020) found that low SES was related to high relational aggression, but not physical aggression. Therefore, when examining the predictive effects of prior victimization experiences in family and school on the development of aggression, we controlled for the effects of gender and SES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%