1973
DOI: 10.2307/2111901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic Status as Related to Aptitude, Attrition, and Achievement of College Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show education is an important determinant, which supports the findings of most previous researches (Harris & Blisard, 2002;Hauser & Warren, 1997;Henninger, 1998;Kerckhoff, 1975;Panudulkitti, 2007;Stanfiel, 1973;Worley & Story, 1967). Based on Table 4, an increase of a year of formal education after the mean number of years of the sample reduces the probability of a household falling into poverty by 0.930.…”
Section: Model Specificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results show education is an important determinant, which supports the findings of most previous researches (Harris & Blisard, 2002;Hauser & Warren, 1997;Henninger, 1998;Kerckhoff, 1975;Panudulkitti, 2007;Stanfiel, 1973;Worley & Story, 1967). Based on Table 4, an increase of a year of formal education after the mean number of years of the sample reduces the probability of a household falling into poverty by 0.930.…”
Section: Model Specificationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Cross-cultural research has demonstrated the need to consider the influence of socioeconomic (Rendon, 1995;Boughan, 1995;Paterson, 1991;Jones and Watson, 1990;Adams, Wasikhongo, and Nahemow, 1987;Grosset and Hawk, 1986;Smith, 1981;Stanfiel, 1973). For example, research has shown that socioeconomic status is associated with educational attainment and aspirations (Paterson, 1991;Adams, Wasikhongo, and Nahemow, 1987), attrition and retention (Rendon, 1995;Boughan, 1995;Jones and Watson, 1990;Grosset and Hawk, 1986;Smith, 1981;Stanfiel, 1973), and quality of teaching ( Jones and Watson, 1990).…”
Section: Background Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite decades of educational reforms, the socioeconomic status (SES)-based achievement gap persists in the United States (Lee, 2006;Lee & Wong, 2004). Studies conducted over the past 50 years provided overwhelming evidence to establish the constraint that SES imposes on student achievement (e.g., Berliner, 2013;Caldas & Bankston, 1999;Caro, McDonald, & Willms, 2009;Chudgar & Luschei 2009;Coleman, Campbell, Hobson, McPartland, Mood, Weinfield, & York, 1966;Heyneman & Loxley, 1983;Huang & Sebastian, 2015;Jimerson, Egeland, & Teo, 1999;Konstantopoulos & Borman, 2011;Lee & Bowen, 2006;OECD, 2013aOECD, , 2013bReardon, 2011;Sirin, 2005;So & Chan, 1984;Stanfiel, 1973). According to this large body of research, students from low-SES backgrounds show lower achievement due to various barriers such as lack of economic resources (e.g., Chiu, 2007;Parcel & Dufur, 2001), low parental involvement (e.g., Barnard, 2004;DePlanty, Coulter-Kern, & Duchane, 2007), and limited access to high quality educational opportunities (e.g., Baker, Goesling, & LeTendre, 2002), for example, highly qualified teachers (Akiba, LeTendre, & Scribner, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%