Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system

Abstract

BackgroundLow socioeconomic status can increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but it remains unclear whether this negative association is attributed to inadequate prenatal care. Korea has been adopting a universal healthcare system. All Korean citizens must be enrolled National Health Insurance (NHI) or be recipient of Medical Aid (MA). In addition, Korean government launched a financial support system for antenatal care for all pregnant women in 2008. Therefore, in theory, there is no financial barrier to receive prenatal cares regardless of someone’s social class. However, it is still unclear whether adverse pregnancy outcomes observed in low-income women are attributable to low SES or to economic barriers specific to the utilization of medical services. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether socioeconomic status affects pregnancy outcomes after the introduction of this support system, which allows all pregnant women to receive adequate prenatal care regardless of socioeconomic status.MethodsUsing the National Health Insurance database in Korea, we selected women who gave birth between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. As a proxy indicator reflecting socioeconomic status, we classified subjects as MA recipient (“low” SES) or a NHI beneficiary (“middle/high” SES).ResultsIn the MA group, 29.4% women received inadequate prenatal care, compared to 11.4% in the NHI group. Mothers in the MA group were more likely to have an abortion (30.1%), rather than deliver a baby, than those in the NHI group (20.7%, P < 0.001). Mothers in the MA group were also more likely to undergo a Caesarean delivery (45.8%; NHI group: 39.6%, P < 0.001), and have preeclampsia (1.5%; NHI group: 0.6%, P < 0.001), obstetric hemorrhage (4.7%; NHI group: 3.9%, P = 0.017), and a preterm delivery (2.1%; NHI group: 1.4%, P < 0.001) than those in the NHI group.ConclusionsWomen in the MA group tended to show higher rates of abortion, Caesarean delivery, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and obstetrical hemorrhage than those in the NHI group Therefore, health authorities should consider investigating what kind of barriers exist or what factors may affect these inequitable outcomes.

Serum Magnesium Levels in Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy in Patients That Developed Pre-Eclampsia and Feto-Maternal Outcome

“…Contrary to the belief that women of low socio-economic status have higher risk of developing pre-eclampsia [15] [23], our study observed no significant difference in social classes of the study groups.…”

Prevalence and factors associated with meconium stained amniotic fluid in a tertiary hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross sectional study

“…Those women whose monthly income was less than 5000 ETB (185 USD) were 2 times more likely to develop MSAF than those whose income was 5000 ETB (185 USD) and above. This might be explained by women who have low income tends to have delay in seeking medical care, tends to use public transport or may came later when labor prolongs [26].…”

Vertically Transferred Immunity in Neonates: Mothers, Mechanisms and Mediators

“…Vaccinated women tended to be European, have a higher income level and receive care from an obstetrician. Since pregnancy complications as well as mother and infant mortality are rather associated with lower socioeconomic status and non-caucasian ethnicity (25)(26)(27), it is tempting to assume that higher rates for primary and secondary outcomes observed in this study may be due to confounders.…”