Socioemotional wealth and performance in private family firms

Abstract

Purpose Socioemotional wealth (SEW) has emerged as a defining concept that distinguishes family-owned business organizations from businesses that are not exclusively controlled by family coalitions. This empirical study expands the literature by presenting a more nuanced understanding of how individual dimensions of socioemotional wealth interacts with firm performance outcomes. Deploying the stakeholder theory, the purpose of this study is to propose a research model linking the five dimensions of SEW with firm performance to propose and test a set of hypotheses. Design/methodology/approach To test the hypotheses, data were collected through a survey of 357 medium-to-large private family firms in Bangladesh that were involved in export-oriented production of ready-made garments. Based on structural equation modeling, the data were analyzed using SmartPLS. Findings The results indicate that out of the five dimensions of SEW, three dimensions – family identification, emotional attachment and renewal of bonds through dynastic succession – have a positive and significant impact on firm performance. On the other hand, family control and influence have a significant but negative impact on firm performance. The only exception is in the case of binding social ties, which indicate a non-significant relationship. Research limitations/implications By attempting to provide a clearer and predictable link between family-centric non-economic goals and firm-centric business goals, the study contributes to theory building and attempts to address the conflict in the literature in the study of family involvement in management and performance of the business enterprise. Practical implications For industry practitioners and family business owners, it could provide guidance on which family-centric goals would maximize benefits to the firm and address the family-based utilities. Future strategic plans aimed at growth and sustainability of family firms can derive important clues from the findings of this study and design actionable goals that leverage those dimensions of socioemotional wealth that have a positive impact on firm performance. Social implications Social implications of ensuring survival of family businesses are significant because of their role as one of the largest sources of employment generation in most societies. Policymakers and regulatory authorities would be able to frame customized initiatives to foster growth and sustainability of family enterprises that have such large impact on the economy. Originality/value Theoretical contribution of the study comes from a more nuanced understanding of relationships between the individual dimension of SEW and firm performance, which will delineate a more consistent and predictable link between family-centric goals and firm-level outcomes. From the perspective of practical contribution, this may provide useful guidelines to industry practitioners and policymakers to frame initiatives that enable growth and sustainability of family firms that are typically the largest employment generators in most economies.

Management accounting research in family businesses: a review of the status quo and future agenda

“…Notwithstanding this, coming together of "management accounting" and "family firms" has only sporadically occurred in the minds of past researchers, and management accounting as well as family business literatures have seen developments on their own fronts. Although management accounting scholars have given priority to public and private commercial entities as their empirical contexts, management accounting has somewhat escaped mainstream family business research, which has concentrated on facets such as performance (Williams et al, 2019;Aloulou, 2018;Razzak and Jassem, 2019), decision-making (Pimentel et al, 2018) and innovation (Hillebrand, 2019;Salmon and Allman, 2019;Röd, 2019). An emerging interest is nevertheless witnessed on the nexus between accounting and family businesses, as demonstrated by an increasing number of recent family business studies with an accounting twist (Hiebl et al, 2013;Hiebl, 2013a;Mitter and Hiebl, 2017).…”

A dynamic capabilities approach for the survival of Pakistani family-owned business in the digital world

“…In Pakistan, the society has increasingly prioritized the solutions to be provided by businesses which government is not addressing. The political and economical shift has allowed the family businesses to merge their social and commercial missions (Razzak and Jassem, 2019). Family businesses are generally viewed to be for-profit organizations (Osnes et al , 2017).…”

Strategic entrepreneurship and performance: an institutional perspective on Indian family businesses

“…The notion that family logics influence the corporate strategy and organisational practices are well accepted in the family business literature (Burt, 1997;Granovetter, 1985;Chua et al, 2003;Hoffman et al, 2006;Chrisman et al, 2012). In particular, family firms attempt to preserve SEW (Berrone et al, 2012;Razzak et al, 2019) across generations (Murphy et al, 2019), especially in the face of economic concerns (Arregle et al, 2007;Miller et al, 2009;Debicki et al, 2016;Machek et al, 2019) resulting in business resilience (Gupta and Bhattacharya, 2016). Further, these firms have a cohesive clan culture (Miller and Breton-Miller, 2005;Bertrand and Schoar, 2006) and portray a high degree of altruistic behaviour (Schulze et al, 2003;Zellweger et al, 2016).…”