Sociolinguistic and Sociocultural Features of Language Use: Forms of Address in British English and Spanish

Jureva, Julia; Rudakova, Ekaterina; Larina, Tatiana V.

doi:10.21125/edulearn.2018.0800

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Интересно отметить, что наличие эмоциональной окраски у термина родства может способствовать тому, что данный термин чаще употребляется в функции обращения, так как таким образом может выражаться симпатия и уважение к собеседнику (ср. Khalil, Larina & Suryanarayan 2018, Larina & Suryanarayan 2013, Yuryeva, Rudakova & Larina 2018.…”

Section: Reviewsunclassified

Analysis of Kinship Terms Using Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Anna Wierzbicka’s Approach

Kotorova

2018

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Lingvist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Аннотация В данной статье дается краткий обзор некоторых из работ Анны Вежбицкой, посвященных рассмотрению терминов родства в разных лингвокультурах (Wierzbicka 2016a, 2016b, 2017). Анализируется предложенный А. Вежбицкой подход к описанию семантики терминов родства с помощью Естественного Семантического Метаязыка (ЕСМ), основанного на использовании лексических универсалий. Показаны преимущества данного подхода перед другими методами анализа, в частности то, как он позволяет преодолеть евроцентризм в рассмотрении систем родства в не европейских культурах.

show abstract

Section: Reviewsunclassified

Analysis of Kinship Terms Using Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Anna Wierzbicka’s Approach

Kotorova

2018

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Lingvist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Socio-Cultural Context, Address Forms and Communicative Styles (A Case Study of British and Indian Englishes)

Larina

Suryanarayan

Yuryeva

2019

Vestn. Volgogr. gos. univ. Ser. 2 Jazykozn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to identify differences in the use of Address Forms for an unfamiliar addressee in British and Indian English and explain them through a sociocultural context. Given the fact that address forms are dependent on both situational and geographical parameters, and taking into account the rich cultural diversity of India, the study is limited to address forms used by residents of the two capital cities – London and Delhi. The material was collected through observations and questionnaires and was analysed with a comparative analysis (both quantitative and qualitative) and reference to the theory of cultural differences, intercultural pragmatics, politeness theory and the theory of culturally specific communication styles or communicative ethnic styles. For clarification of the results, the interview method was also used, attempting to establish the regularity with which the representatives of the given cultures use nominative address forms for an unfamiliar addressee, the choice of address forms for different age groups and gender and the sociocultural factors affecting the choice of address forms. The analysis of experimental data shows significant differences both in the choice of address forms and in their functioning, it convincingly demonstrates the influence of the Hindi language and local culture on the Indian version of the English language, on the communicative behaviour of Indian bilinguals in the given situation and their communication style in general.

show abstract

Sociolinguistic and Sociocultural Features of Language Use: Forms of Address in British English and Spanish

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of Kinship Terms Using Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Anna Wierzbicka’s Approach

Analysis of Kinship Terms Using Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Anna Wierzbicka’s Approach

Socio-Cultural Context, Address Forms and Communicative Styles (A Case Study of British and Indian Englishes)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About