The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Phonology 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781315228112-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociolinguistic variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socioeconomic status. Children of lower socioeconomic status (SES) in Díaz-Campos (2005) had a lower percentage of retention of intervocalic /d/ than those of higher SES. Parents' SES was significant in Chevrot et al (2000): workers' children had higher rates of /R/ deletion than managers' children in certain contexts.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic status. Children of lower socioeconomic status (SES) in Díaz-Campos (2005) had a lower percentage of retention of intervocalic /d/ than those of higher SES. Parents' SES was significant in Chevrot et al (2000): workers' children had higher rates of /R/ deletion than managers' children in certain contexts.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A zero-occlusion rhotic is defined here as an innovative tap or trill that presents no single (in the case of taps) or periodic (in the case of trills) lingual closure(s) with the surface of the palate. Diaz Campos (2008) found that approximant variants are more common than trilled segments in the Spanish of Venezuela; Hammond (1999) found assibilated variants being predominantly produced in Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Puerto Rico; Willis (2006) examined pre-aspirated taps in the Spanish of Dominican Republic; and Colantoni (2006) revealed a continuum of fricative to approximant rhotics. A great deal of these allophones in Central American Spanish and certain Colombian Spanish dialects have been also documented.…”
Section: Rhotic Variation and Sound Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this diversity of productions, it is perhaps not surprising that most sociophonetic research on Spanish /r/ focuses on data from non-canonical varieties (Colantoni, 2006a(Colantoni, , 2006bDelgado-Díaz & Galarza, 2015;Díaz-Campos, 2008;Rissel, 1989;Vigil, 2018;Willis, 2006Willis, , 2007inter alia). Studies focused on canonical varieties alternatively investigate the phonetic correlates signaling the phonemic tap-trill contrast.…”
Section: External Factors Conditioning the Usage Of The Spanish Phone...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common finding is that female speakers are often more "canonical" in comparison to male speakers, which happens in one of two ways. First, female speakers are far more likely to favor multi-occlusion variants in comparison to non-canonical variants, such as assibilated, approximant, or dorsal trills (e.g., Díaz-Campos, 2008;Klee et al, 2022;Valentín-Márquez, 2007; see also Table 3 in Section 5.2). Second, female speakers have been shown to produce more occlusions on average in contrast to male speakers (e.g., Bradley & Willis, 2012;Henriksen, 2014;Melero-García, 2015).…”
Section: External Factors Conditioning the Usage Of The Spanish Phone...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation